Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 801

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Case Control Etiologic Study of Sarcoidosis: Environmental and Occupational Risk Factors

Newman, Lee S., Rose, Cecile S., Bresnitz, Eddy A., Rossman, Milton D., Barnard, Juliana, Frederick, Margaret, Terrin, Michael L., Weinberger, Steven E., Moller, David R., McLennan, Geoffrey, Hunninghake, Gary, DePalo, Louis, Baughman, Robert P., Iannuzzi, Michael C., Judson, Marc A., Knatterud, Genell L., Thompson, Bruce W., Teirstein, Alvin S., Yeager, Henry, Johns, Carol J., Rabin, David L., Rybicki, Benjamin A., Cherniack, Reuben·2004·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

Past research suggests that environmental factors may be associated with sarcoidosis risk. We conducted a case control study to test a priori hypotheses that environmental and occupational exposures are associated with sarcoidosis. Ten centers recruited 706 newly diagnosed patients with sarcoidosis and an equal number of age-, race-, and sex-matched control subjects. Interviewers administered questionnaires containing questions regarding occupational and nonoccupational exposures that we assessed in univariable and multivariable analyses. We observed positive associations between sarcoidosis and specific occupations (e.g., agricultural employment, odds ratio [OR] 1.46, confidence interval [CI] 1.13-1.89), exposures (e.g., insecticides at work, OR 1.52, CI 1.14-2.04, and work environments with mold/mildew exposures [environments with possible exposures to microbial bioaerosols], OR 1.61, CI 1.13-2.31). A history of ever smoking cigarettes was less frequent among cases than control subjects (OR 0.62, CI 0.50-0.77). In multivariable modeling, we observed elevated ORs for work in areas with musty odors (OR 1.62, CI 1.24-2.11) and with occupational exposure to insecticides (OR 1.61, CI 1.13-2.28), and a decreased OR related to ever smoking cigarettes (OR 0.65, CI 0.51-0.82). The study did not identify a single, predominant cause of sarcoidosis. We identified several exposures associated with sarcoidosis risk, including insecticides, agricultural employment, and microbial bioaerosols.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.200402-249oc

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 801

Metadata

Authors
Newman, L. S., Rose, C. S., Bresnitz, E. A., Rossman, M. D., Barnard, J., Frederick, M., Terrin, M. L., Weinberger, S. E., Moller, D. R., McLennan, G., Hunninghake, G., DePalo, L., Baughman, R. P., Iannuzzi, M. C., Judson, M. A., Knatterud, G. L., Thompson, B. W., Teirstein, A. S., Yeager, H., Johns, C. J., Rabin, D. L., Rybicki, B. A., & Cherniack, R.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2004-12-15
Volume
170
Issue
12
Pages
1324-1330
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W1926049969
Cited by
801
References
1
FWCI
11.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Case Control Etiologic Study of Sarcoidosis: Environmental and Occupational Risk Factors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.200402-249oc
The paper
Newman, L. S., Rose, C. S., Bresnitz, E. A., Rossman, M. D., Barnard, J., Frederick, M., Terrin, M. L., Weinberger, S. E., Moller, D. R., McLennan, G., Hunninghake, G., DePalo, L., Baughman, R. P., Iannuzzi, M. C., Judson, M. A., Knatterud, G. L., Thompson, B. W., Teirstein, A. S., Yeager, H., . . . Cherniack, R. (2004). A Case Control Etiologic Study of Sarcoidosis: Environmental and Occupational Risk Factors. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200402-249oc

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.