Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 602

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Detection of Lung Cancer by Sensor Array Analyses of Exhaled Breath

Open access
Machado, Roberto F., Laskowski, Daniel, Deffenderfer, Olivia, Burch, Timothy, Zheng, Shuo, Mazzone, Peter J., Mekhail, Tarek, Jennings, Constance, Stoller, James K., Pyle, Jacqueline, Duncan, Jennifer, Dweik, Raed A., Erzurum, Serpil C.·2005·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

RATIONALE: Electronic noses are successfully used in commercial applications, including detection and analysis of volatile organic compounds in the food industry. OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that the electronic nose could identify and discriminate between lung diseases, especially bronchogenic carcinoma. METHODS: In a discovery and training phase, exhaled breath of 14 individuals with bronchogenic carcinoma and 45 healthy control subjects or control subjects without cancer was analyzed. Principal components and canonic discriminant analysis of the sensor data was used to determine whether exhaled gases could discriminate between cancer and noncancer. Discrimination between classes was performed using Mahalanobis distance. Support vector machine analysis was used to create and apply a cancer prediction model prospectively in a separate group of 76 individuals, 14 with and 62 without cancer. MAIN RESULTS: Principal components and canonic discriminant analysis demonstrated discrimination between samples from patients with lung cancer and those from other groups. In the validation study, the electronic nose had 71.4% sensitivity and 91.9% specificity for detecting lung cancer; positive and negative predictive values were 66.6 and 93.4%, respectively. In this population with a lung cancer prevalence of 18%, positive and negative predictive values were 66.6 and 94.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The exhaled breath of patients with lung cancer has distinct characteristics that can be identified with an electronic nose. The results provide feasibility to the concept of using the electronic nose for managing and detecting lung cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.200409-1184oc

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 602

Metadata

Authors
Machado, R. F., Laskowski, D., Deffenderfer, O., Burch, T., Zheng, S., Mazzone, P. J., Mekhail, T., Jennings, C., Stoller, J. K., Pyle, J., Duncan, J., Dweik, R. A., & Erzurum, S. C.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2005-06-01
Volume
171
Issue
11
Pages
1286-1291
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2124721964
Cited by
602
References
1
FWCI
13.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detection of Lung Cancer by Sensor Array Analyses of Exhaled Breath. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.200409-1184oc
The paper
Machado, R. F., Laskowski, D., Deffenderfer, O., Burch, T., Zheng, S., Mazzone, P. J., Mekhail, T., Jennings, C., Stoller, J. K., Pyle, J., Duncan, J., Dweik, R. A., & Erzurum, S. C. (2005). Detection of Lung Cancer by Sensor Array Analyses of Exhaled Breath. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200409-1184oc

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.