The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Clinical Use of Noninvasive Measurements of Airway Inflammation in Steroid Reduction in Children
Abstract
The use of noninvasive methods of monitoring airway inflammation, such as exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) and induced sputum, has been shown to improve asthma monitoring and optimize treatment in adult patients with asthma. There is a lack of comparable data in children. Forty children with stable asthma eligible for inhaled steroid reduction were reviewed every 8 weeks, and their inhaled steroid dose halved if clinically indicated. eNO, sputum induction combined with bronchial hyperreactivity testing, and exhaled breath condensate collection were performed at each visit to predict success or failure of reduction of inhaled steroids. Thirty of 40 (75%) children tolerated at least one dose reduction, 12 of 40 (30%) were successfully weaned off, and in total, 15 of 40 (38%) children experienced loss of asthma control. Treatment reduction was successful in all children who had no eosinophils in induced sputum before the attempted reduction. Using multiple logistic regression, increased eNO (odds ratio, 6.3; confidence interval, 3.75-10.58) and percentage of sputum eosinophils (odds ratio, 1.38; confidence interval, 1.06-1.81) were significant predictors of failed reduction. These findings suggest that monitoring airway inflammation may be useful in optimizing treatment in children with asthma.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dweik, R. A., Boggs, P. B., Erzurum, S. C., Irvin, C. G., Leigh, M. W., Lundberg, J. O., Olin, A.-C., Plummer, A. L., & Taylor, D. R. (2011) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.9120-11st · Cited by 2,539
Reddel, H. K., Taylor, D. R., Bateman, E. D., Boulet, L.-P., Boushey, H. A., Busse, W. W., Casale, T. B., Chanez, P., Enright, P. L., Gibson, P. G., et al. (2009) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.200801-060st · Cited by 1,918
Exhaled breath condensate: methodological recommendations and unresolved questions
Horváth, I., Hunt, J., & Barnes, P. J. (2005) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.05.00029705 · Cited by 1,284
Asthma: defining of the persistent adult phenotypes
Wenzel, S. E. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69290-8 · Cited by 1,043
Diagnosis and treatment of asthma in childhood: a PRACTALL consensus report
Bacharier, L. B., Boner, A., Carlsen, K. ‐., Eigenmann, P. A., Frischer, T., Götz, M., Helms, P. J., Hunt, J., Liu, A., Papadopoulos, N., et al. (2008) · Allergy · doi:10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01586.x · Cited by 640
Metadata
- Authors
- Zacharasiewicz, A., Wilson, N., Lex, C., Erin, E. M., Li, A. M., Hansel, T., Khan, M., & Bush, A.
- Venue
- American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-05-15
- Volume
- 171
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1077-1082
- ISSN
- 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-4970
- OpenAlex
- W2049569970
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical Use of Noninvasive Measurements of Airway Inflammation in Steroid Reduction in Children. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.200409-1242oc
- The paper
- Zacharasiewicz, A., Wilson, N., Lex, C., Erin, E. M., Li, A. M., Hansel, T., Khan, M., & Bush, A. (2005). Clinical Use of Noninvasive Measurements of Airway Inflammation in Steroid Reduction in Children. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200409-1242oc
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.