Cited by 57Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchHormonal and reproductive studiesMuscle Physiology and Disorders

Respiratory and Skeletal Muscles in Hypogonadal Men with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Laghi, Franco, Langbein, W. Edwin, Antonescu-Turcu, Andreea, Jubran, Amal, Bammert, Christine, Tobin, Martin J.·2005·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

Hypogonadism, found in about one-third of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), has potential for decreasing muscle mass and muscle performance. Compared with eugonadal patients, we hypothesized that hypogonadal patients with COPD have decreased respiratory and skeletal muscle performance. Nineteen hypogonadal and 20 eugonadal men with COPD (FEV1 1.14 ± 0.08 and 1.17 ± 0.11 L [standard error], respectively) were studied. Diaphragmatic contractility, assessed as transdiaphragmatic twitch pressure generated by phrenic nerve stimulation, was similar in hypogonadal and eugonadal patients: 20.6 ± 2.2 and 19.8 ± 2.5 cm H2O, respectively. During progressive inspiratory threshold loading, hypogonadal and eugonadal patients had similar respiratory muscle endurance times (302 ± 29 and 313 ± 48 seconds, respectively) and airway pressure sustained during the last minute of loading (38.2 ± 3.0 and 40.5 ± 4.7 cm H2O, respectively) (similar to predicted values in healthy subjects). Hypogonadal and eugonadal patients had equivalent limb muscle strength and endurance. During cycle exercise to exhaustion, exercise performance, gas exchange, and respiratory muscle recruitment (estimated by esophageal and gastric pressure swings during tidal breathing) were similar in both groups. In conclusion, hypogonadism does not decrease respiratory or limb muscle performance and exercise capacity in men with moderate-to-severe COPD who, for the most part, are not underweight.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.200412-1643oc

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 83 · Cited by 57

Authors
Laghi, F., Langbein, W. E., Antonescu-Turcu, A., Jubran, A., Bammert, C., & Tobin, M. J.
Affiliations
Loyola University Chicago (US)
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2005-03
Volume
171
Issue
6
Pages
598-605
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2123839756
Cited by
57
References
83
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
Keywords
hypogonadism, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, respiratory muscle function, skeletal muscle strength, diaphragm contractility, muscular endurance, exercise capacity, androgen deficiency
MeSH terms
Aged, Diaphragm, Electric Stimulation, Exercise Test, Humans, Hypogonadism, Male, Muscle Contraction, Phrenic Nerve, Respiratory Muscles, Case-Control Studies, Exercise Tolerance, Muscle, Skeletal, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review