Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 547

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

High-Resolution Computed Tomography in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Diagnosis and Prognosis

Lynch, David A., Godwin, J. David, Safrin, Sharon, Starko, Karen M., Hormel, Phil, Brown, Kevin K., Raghu, Ganesh, King, Talmadge E., Bradford, Williamson Z., Schwartz, David A., Webb, W. Richard·2005·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

RATIONALE: High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is an integral aspect of the evaluation of patients with suspected idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, few studies have evaluated its use in a large cohort. OBJECTIVES: To describe HRCT features in patients with mild to moderate IPF, compare diagnostic evaluations by a radiology core (three thoracic radiologists) with those by study-site radiologists, correlate baseline clinical and physiologic variables with HRCT findings, and evaluate their association with mortality. METHODS: We assessed HRCT scans from patients with IPF (n = 315) enrolled in a randomized controlled study evaluating IFN-gamma1b. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There was concordance between study-site and core radiologists regarding the diagnosis of IPF in 86% of cases. Diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide (DLCO) was the physiologic characteristic most highly correlated with HRCT findings. Multivariate analysis identified three independent predictors of mortality: a higher extent of fibrosis score increased the risk of death (p < 0.0001), whereas a higher percent-predicted DLCO (p = 0.004) and treatment assignment to IFN-gamma1b rather than placebo (p = 0.04) reduced the risk of death. CONCLUSIONS: A study-site diagnosis of IPF on HRCT was regularly confirmed by core radiologists. Extent of reticulation and honeycombing on HRCT is an important independent predictor of mortality in patients with IPF.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.200412-1756oc

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 547

Metadata

Authors
Lynch, D. A., Godwin, J. D., Safrin, S., Starko, K. M., Hormel, P., Brown, K. K., Raghu, G., King, T. E., Bradford, W. Z., Schwartz, D. A., & Webb, W. R.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2005-08-15
Volume
172
Issue
4
Pages
488-493
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W1924766221
Cited by
547
References
2
FWCI
13.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High-Resolution Computed Tomography in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Diagnosis and Prognosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.200412-1756oc
The paper
Lynch, D. A., Godwin, J. D., Safrin, S., Starko, K. M., Hormel, P., Brown, K. K., Raghu, G., King, T. E., Bradford, W. Z., Schwartz, D. A., & Webb, W. R. (2005). High-Resolution Computed Tomography in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Diagnosis and Prognosis. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200412-1756oc

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.