The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Long-term Oxygen Treatment in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Recommendations for Future Research: An NHLBI Workshop Report
Open accessAbstract
Long-term oxygen treatment (LTOT) prolongs life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and severe resting hypoxemia. Although this benefit is proven by clinical trials, scientific research has not provided definitive guidance regarding who should receive LTOT and how it should be delivered. Deficiencies in knowledge and in current research activity related to LTOT are especially striking in comparison to the importance of LTOT in the management of COPD and the associated costs. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, in collaboration with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, convened a working group to discuss research on LTOT. Participants in this meeting identified specific areas in which further investigation would likely lead to improvements in the care of patients with COPD or reductions in the cost of their care. The group recommended four clinical trials in subjects with COPD: (1) efficacy of ambulatory O(2) supplementation in subjects who experience oxyhemoglobin desaturation during physical activity but are not severely hypoxemic at rest; (2) efficacy of LTOT in subjects with severe COPD and only moderate hypoxemia; (3) efficacy of nocturnal O(2) supplementation in subjects who show episodic desaturation during sleep that is not attributable to obstructive sleep apnea; and (4) effectiveness of an activity-dependent prescription for O(2) flow rate that is based on clinical tests performed at rest, during exercise, and during sleep.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A randomized trial comparing lung-volume-reduction surgery with medical therapy for severe emphysema
(2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa030287 · Cited by 2,071
Regulation of Mammalian O 2 Homeostasis by Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1
Semenza, G. L. (1999) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.15.1.551 · Cited by 1,914
O'DONNELL, D. E., D'ARSIGNY, C., & WEBB, K. A. (2001) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.163.4.2007026 · Cited by 332
Cited by
Global burden of COPD: risk factors, prevalence, and future trends
Mannino, D. M., & Buist, A. S. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61380-4 · Cited by 2,079
Hypoxemia in patients with COPD: cause, effects, and disease progression
McNicholas, W., Kent, & Mitchell (2011) · International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease · doi:10.2147/copd.s10611 · Cited by 434
Using Telemedicine to Monitor the Patient with Chronic Respiratory Failure
Ambrosino, N., & Pierucci, P. (2021) · Life · doi:10.3390/life11111113 · Cited by 16
Duan, K. I., Obara, E., Wong, E. S., Liao, J. M., Sabbatini, A. K., Donovan, L. M., Spece, L. J., Feemster, L. C., & Au, D. H. (2024) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.5738 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Croxton, T. L., & Bailey, W. C.
- Venue
- American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-08-15
- Volume
- 174
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 373-378
- ISSN
- 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-4970
- OpenAlex
- W2123013271
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-term Oxygen Treatment in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Recommendations for Future Research: An NHLBI Workshop Report. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.200507-1161ws
- The paper
- Croxton, T. L., & Bailey, W. C. (2006). Long-term Oxygen Treatment in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Recommendations for Future Research: An NHLBI Workshop Report. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200507-1161ws
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.