Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 714

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Infliximab Therapy in Patients with Chronic Sarcoidosis and Pulmonary Involvement

Baughman, Robert P., Drent, Marjolein, Kavuru, Mani, Judson, Marc A., Costabel, Ulrich, du Bois, Roland, Albera, Carlo, Brutsche, Martin, Davis, Gerald, Donohue, James F., Müller-Quernheim, Joachim, Schlenker-Herceg, Rozsa, Flavin, Susan, Lo, Kim Hung, Oemar, Barry, Barnathan, Elliot S., on behalf of the Sarcoidosis Investigators·2006·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

RATIONALE: Evidence suggests that tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha plays an important role in the pathophysiology of sarcoidosis. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of infliximab in sarcoidosis. METHODS: A phase 2, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted in 138 patients with chronic pulmonary sarcoidosis. Patients were randomized to receive intravenous infusions of infliximab (3 or 5 mg/kg) or placebo at Weeks 0, 2, 6, 12, 18, and 24 and were followed through Week 52. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary endpoint was the change from baseline to Week 24 in percent of predicted FVC. Major secondary efficacy parameters included Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire, 6-min walk distance, Borg's CR10 dyspnea score, and the proportion of Lupus Pernio Physician's Global Assessment responders for patients with facial skin involvement. Patients in the combined infliximab groups (3 and 5 mg/kg) had a mean increase of 2.5% from baseline to Week 24 in the percent of predicted FVC, compared with no change in placebo-treated patients (p = 0.038). No significant differences between the treatment groups were observed for any of the major secondary endpoints at Week 24. Results of post hoc exploratory analyses suggested that patients with more severe disease tended to benefit more from infliximab treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Infliximab therapy resulted in a statistically significant improvement in % predicted FVC at Week 24. The clinical importance of this finding is not clear. The results of this Phase 2 clinical study support further evaluation of anti-TNF-alpha therapy in severe, chronic, symptomatic sarcoidosis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.200603-402oc

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 714

Metadata

Authors
Baughman, R. P., Drent, M., Kavuru, M., Judson, M. A., Costabel, U., du Bois, R., Albera, C., Brutsche, M., Davis, G., Donohue, J. F., Müller-Quernheim, J., Schlenker-Herceg, R., Flavin, S., Lo, K. H., Oemar, B., Barnathan, E. S., & on behalf of the Sarcoidosis Investigators
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2006-10-01
Volume
174
Issue
7
Pages
795-802
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2131718547
Cited by
714
References
2
FWCI
25.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Infliximab Therapy in Patients with Chronic Sarcoidosis and Pulmonary Involvement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.200603-402oc
The paper
Baughman, R. P., Drent, M., Kavuru, M., Judson, M. A., Costabel, U., du Bois, R., Albera, C., Brutsche, M., Davis, G., Donohue, J. F., Müller-Quernheim, J., Schlenker-Herceg, R., Flavin, S., Lo, K. H., Oemar, B., Barnathan, E. S., & on behalf of the Sarcoidosis Investigators. (2006). Infliximab Therapy in Patients with Chronic Sarcoidosis and Pulmonary Involvement. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200603-402oc

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.