Cited by 365Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchAsthma and respiratory diseasesCystic Fibrosis Research Advances

Sex Differences in Severe Pulmonary Emphysema

Open access
Martinez, Fernando J., Curtis, Jeffrey L., Sciurba, Frank, Mumford, Jeanette, Giardino, Nicholas D., Weinmann, Gail, Kazerooni, Ella, Murray, Susan +10 more·2007·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

Rationale: Limited data on sex differences in advanced COPD are available. Objectives: To compare male and female emphysema patients with severe disease. Methods: One thousand fifty-three patients (38.8% female) evaluated for lung volume reduction surgery as part of the National Emphysema Treatment Trial were analyzed. Measurements and Main Results: Detailed clinical, physiological, and radiological assessment, including quantitation of emphysema severity and distribution from helical chest computed tomography, was completed. In a subgroup (n = 101), airway size and thickness was determined by histological analyses of resected tissue. Women were younger and exhibited a lower body mass index (BMI), shorter smoking history, less severe airflow obstruction, lower Dlco and arterial Po2, higher arterial Pco2, shorter six-minute walk distance, and lower maximal wattage during oxygen-supplemented cycle ergometry. For a given FEV1% predicted, age, number of pack-years, and proportion of emphysema, women experienced greater dyspnea, higher modified BODE, more depression, lower SF-36 mental component score, and lower quality of well-being. Overall emphysema was less severe in women, with the difference from men most evident in the outer peel of the lung. Females had thicker small airway walls relative to luminal perimeters. Conclusions: In patients with severe COPD, women, relative to men, exhibit anatomically smaller airway lumens with disproportionately thicker airway walls, and emphysema that is less extensive and characterized by smaller hole size and less peripheral involvement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.200606-828oc

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When restricted to emphysema, women present a different pattern of disease compared with men, ie, smaller airway lumen and thicker airway walls.

    “When restricted to emphysema, women also present a different pattern of disease compared with men, ie, smaller airway lumen and thicker airway walls.136,137”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martinez, F. J., Curtis, J. L., Sciurba, F., Mumford, J., Giardino, N. D., Weinmann, G., Kazerooni, E., Murray, S., Criner, G. J., Sin, D. D., Hogg, J., Ries, A. L., Han, M., Fishman, A. P., Make, B., Hoffman, E. A., Mohsenifar, Z., & Wise, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Temple University (US)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • National Jewish Health (US)
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2007-08-01
Volume
176
Issue
3
Pages
243-252
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2016264305
Cited by
365
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 23
FWCI
25.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • University of Washington
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • Temple University
  • National Institutes of Health (n01hr076109-006, n01hr076108-002, n01hr076114-001, n01hr076105-002, n01hr076104-001, n01hr076107-006, n01hr076112-000, n01hr076110-005, n01hr076118-007, n01hr076111-002, n01hr076119-008, n01hr076102-007, n01hr076115-008, n01hr076116-002, n01hr076101-006, n01hr076113-000, n01hr076106-002, n01hr076103-001)
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
  • Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (N01HR76118, N01 HR 76111, N01-HR76119, N01 HR 76102, N01HR76110, R01HL082480, N01 HR 76109, N01 HR 76104, N01HR76106, N01HR76108, N01HR76101, N01HR76115, N01 HR76103, N01 HR 76116, N01HR76114, N01 HR76113, N01HR76112, N01 HR76107, N01 HR 76105)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
Keywords
sex differences, emphysema, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lung volume reduction surgery, National Emphysema Treatment Trial, emphysema severity, emphysema distribution, dyspnea, quality of life, depression, body mass index, smoking history, airflow obstruction
MeSH terms
Aged, Bronchi, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pulmonary Emphysema, Quality of Life, Respiratory Function Tests, Severity of Illness Index, Sex Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review