Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 354

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Computed Tomography Findings in Pathological Usual Interstitial Pneumonia: Relationship to Survival

Sumikawa, Hiromitsu, Johkoh, Takeshi, Colby, Thomas V., Ichikado, Kazuya, Suga, Moritaka, Taniguchi, Hiroyuki, Kondoh, Yasuhiro, Ogura, Takashi, Arakawa, Hiroaki, Fujimoto, Kiminori, Inoue, Atsuo, Mihara, Naoki, Honda, Osamu, Tomiyama, Noriyuki, Nakamura, Hironobu, Müller, Nestor L.·2008·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

RATIONALE: Patients with a clinicopathological diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) may have typical findings of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) on computed tomography (CT) or nonspecific or atypical findings, including those often seen in nonspecific interstitial pneumonia. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to revisit the high-resolution CT findings of IPF and to clarify the correlation between the CT findings and mortality. METHODS: The study included 98 patients with a histologic diagnosis of UIP and a clinical diagnosis of IPF. Two observers evaluated the CT findings independently and classified each case into one of the following three categories: (1) definite UIP, (2) consistent with UIP, or (3) suggestive of alternative diagnosis. The correlation between the CT categories and mortality was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test, as well as Cox proportional hazards regression models. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Thirty-three of the 98 CT scans were classified as definite UIP, 36 as consistent with UIP, 29 as suggestive of an alternative diagnosis. The mean survival was 45.7, 57.9, and 76.9 months, respectively. There was no significant difference in survival among the three categories (all P > 0.05). Traction bronchiectasis and fibrosis scores were significant predictors of outcome (hazard ratios: 1.30 and 1.10, respectively; 95% confidence intervals: 1.18-14.2 and 1.03-1.19, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with IPF and UIP pattern on the biopsy, the pattern of abnormality on thin-section CT, whether characteristic of UIP or suggestive of alternative diagnosis, does not influence prognosis. Prognosis is influenced by traction bronchiectasis and fibrosis scores.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.200611-1696oc

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 354

Metadata

Authors
Sumikawa, H., Johkoh, T., Colby, T. V., Ichikado, K., Suga, M., Taniguchi, H., Kondoh, Y., Ogura, T., Arakawa, H., Fujimoto, K., Inoue, A., Mihara, N., Honda, O., Tomiyama, N., Nakamura, H., & Müller, N. L.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2008-02-15
Volume
177
Issue
4
Pages
433-439
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W1853136581
Cited by
354
References
0
FWCI
10.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computed Tomography Findings in Pathological Usual Interstitial Pneumonia: Relationship to Survival. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.200611-1696oc
The paper
Sumikawa, H., Johkoh, T., Colby, T. V., Ichikado, K., Suga, M., Taniguchi, H., Kondoh, Y., Ogura, T., Arakawa, H., Fujimoto, K., Inoue, A., Mihara, N., Honda, O., Tomiyama, N., Nakamura, H., & Müller, N. L. (2008). Computed Tomography Findings in Pathological Usual Interstitial Pneumonia: Relationship to Survival. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200611-1696oc

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.