Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,230

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interstitial Lung Disease in Systemic Sclerosis: A Simple Staging System

Goh, Nicole S. L., Desai, Sujal R., Veeraraghavan, Srihari, Hansell, David M., Copley, Susan J., Maher, Toby M., Corte, Tamera J., Sander, Clare R., Ratoff, Jonathan, Devaraj, Anand, Bozovic, Gracijela, Denton, Christopher P., Black, Carol M., du Bois, Roland M., Wells, Athol U.·2008·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

RATIONALE: In interstitial lung disease complicating systemic sclerosis (SSc-ILD), the optimal prognostic use of baseline pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is uncertain. OBJECTIVES: To construct a readily applicable prognostic algorithm in SSc-ILD, integrating PFTs and HRCT. METHODS: The prognostic value of baseline PFT and HRCT variables was quantified in patients with SSc-ILD (n = 215) against survival and serial PFT data. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Increasingly extensive disease on HRCT was a powerful predictor of mortality (P < 0.0005), with an optimal extent threshold of 20%. In patients with HRCT extent of 10-30% (termed indeterminate disease), an FVC threshold of 70% was an adequate prognostic substitute. On the basis of these observations, SSc-ILD was staged as limited disease (minimal disease on HRCT or, in indeterminate cases, FVC >or= 70%) or extensive disease (severe disease on HRCT or, in indeterminate cases, FVC < 70%). This system (hazards ratio [HR], 3.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.19-5.46; P < 0.0005) was more discriminatory than an HRCT threshold of 20% (HR, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.57-3.92; P < 0.0005) or an FVC threshold of 70% (HR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.34-3.32; P = 0.001). The system was evaluated by four trainees and four practitioners, with minimal and severe disease on HRCT defined as clearly < 20% or clearly > 20%, respectively, and the use of an FVC threshold of 70% in indeterminate cases. The staging system was predictive of mortality for all scorers, with prognostic separation higher for practitioners (HR, 3.39-3.82) than trainees (HR, 1.87-2.60). CONCLUSIONS: An easily applicable limited/extensive staging system for SSc-ILD, based on combined evaluation with HRCT and PFTs, provides discriminatory prognostic information.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.200706-877oc

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,230

Metadata

Authors
Goh, N. S. L., Desai, S. R., Veeraraghavan, S., Hansell, D. M., Copley, S. J., Maher, T. M., Corte, T. J., Sander, C. R., Ratoff, J., Devaraj, A., Bozovic, G., Denton, C. P., Black, C. M., du Bois, R. M., & Wells, A. U.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2008-06-01
Volume
177
Issue
11
Pages
1248-1254
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2116531828
Cited by
1,230
References
1
FWCI
24.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interstitial Lung Disease in Systemic Sclerosis: A Simple Staging System. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.200706-877oc
The paper
Goh, N. S. L., Desai, S. R., Veeraraghavan, S., Hansell, D. M., Copley, S. J., Maher, T. M., Corte, T. J., Sander, C. R., Ratoff, J., Devaraj, A., Bozovic, G., Denton, C. P., Black, C. M., du Bois, R. M., & Wells, A. U. (2008). Interstitial Lung Disease in Systemic Sclerosis: A Simple Staging System. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200706-877oc

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.