Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 489

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Association of Radiographic Emphysema and Airflow Obstruction with Lung Cancer

Open access
Wilson, David O., Weissfeld, Joel L., Balkan, Arzu, Schragin, Jeffrey G., Fuhrman, Carl R., Fisher, Stephen N., Wilson, Jonathan, Leader, Joseph K., Siegfried, Jill M., Shapiro, Steven D., Sciurba, Frank C.·2008·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

RATIONALE: To study the relationship between emphysema and/or airflow obstruction and lung cancer in a high-risk population. OBJECTIVE: We studied lung cancer related to radiographic emphysema and spirometric airflow obstruction in tobacco-exposed persons who were screened for lung cancer using chest computed tomography (CT). METHODS: Subjects completed questionnaires, spirometry, and low-dose helical chest CT. CT scans were scored for emphysema based on National Emphysema Treatment Trial criteria. Multiple logistic regressions estimated the independent associations between various factors, including radiographic emphysema and airflow obstruction, and subsequent lung cancer diagnosis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among 3,638 subjects, 57.5, 18.8, 14.6, and 9.1% had no, trace, mild, and moderate-severe emphysema, and 57.3, 13.6, 22.8, and 6.4% had no, mild (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease [GOLD] I), moderate (GOLD II), and severe (GOLD III-IV) airflow obstruction. Of 3,638 subjects, 99 (2.7%) received a lung cancer diagnosis. Adjusting for sex, age, years of cigarette smoking, and number of cigarettes smoked daily, logistic regression showed the expected lung cancer association with the presence of airflow obstruction (GOLD I-IV, odds ratio [OR], 2.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33-3.27). A second logistic regression showed lung cancer related to emphysema (OR, 3.56; 95% CI, 2.21-5.73). After additional adjustments for GOLD class, emphysema remained a strong and statistically significant factor related to lung cancer (OR, 3.14; 95% CI, 1.91-5.15). CONCLUSIONS: Emphysema on CT scan and airflow obstruction on spirometry are related to lung cancer in a high-risk population. Emphysema is independently related to lung cancer. Both radiographic emphysema and airflow obstruction should be considered when assessing lung cancer risk.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.200803-435oc

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Cited by

See all 489

Metadata

Authors
Wilson, D. O., Weissfeld, J. L., Balkan, A., Schragin, J. G., Fuhrman, C. R., Fisher, S. N., Wilson, J., Leader, J. K., Siegfried, J. M., Shapiro, S. D., & Sciurba, F. C.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2008-10-01
Volume
178
Issue
7
Pages
738-744
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2166406579
Cited by
489
References
26
FWCI
25.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Association of Radiographic Emphysema and Airflow Obstruction with Lung Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.200803-435oc
The paper
Wilson, D. O., Weissfeld, J. L., Balkan, A., Schragin, J. G., Fuhrman, C. R., Fisher, S. N., Wilson, J., Leader, J. K., Siegfried, J. M., Shapiro, S. D., & Sciurba, F. C. (2008). Association of Radiographic Emphysema and Airflow Obstruction with Lung Cancer. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200803-435oc

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.