The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sarcoidosis-related Mortality in the United States from 1988 to 2007
Open accessAbstract
RATIONALE: It has been nearly 20 years since sarcoidosis mortality was examined at the population level in the United States. OBJECTIVES: To examine mortality rates and underlying causes of death among United States decedents with sarcoidosis from 1988-2007. METHODS: We used data from the National Center for Health Statistics to (1) calculate age-adjusted sarcoidosis-associated mortality rates; (2) examine how those rates differ by age, sex, and race and ethnicity; and (3) determine underlying causes of death among sarcoidosis decedents. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: From 1988-2007, there were 46,450,489 deaths in the United States and 23,679 decedents with sarcoidosis mentioned on their death certificates. Over this time, the age-adjusted, sarcoidosis-related mortality rate increased 50.5% in women and 30.1% in men. The greatest absolute increase in death rates was among non-Hispanic black females. Regardless of sex or race, mortality rates climbed most in decedents 55 years or older. The most common cause of death was sarcoidosis itself. Younger sarcoidosis decedents with pulmonary fibrosis were more likely to be black than white, and younger sarcoidosis decedents were more likely than similarly aged decedents in the general population to have a cardiac cause contribute to death. CONCLUSIONS: From 1988-2007, sarcoidosis-related mortality rates increased significantly, particularly in non-Hispanic black females aged 55 years or older. The underlying cause of death in most patients with sarcoidosis was the disease itself. Among young sarcoidosis decedents, those with pulmonary fibrosis or a cardiac cause contributing to death were more likely to be black than white.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Racial Differences in Sarcoidosis Incidence: A 5-Year Study in a Health Maintenance Organization
Rybicki, B. A., Major, M., Popovich, J., Maliank, M. J., & lannuzzi, M. C. (1997) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009096 · Cited by 1,011
Cited by
Valeyre, D., Prasse, A., Nunes, H., Uzunhan, Y., Brillet, P.-Y., & Müller-Quernheim, J. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60680-7 · Cited by 1,087
The Clinical Features of Sarcoidosis: A Comprehensive Review
Judson, M. A. (2015) · Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology · doi:10.1007/s12016-014-8450-y · Cited by 281
Predictors of mortality in pulmonary sarcoidosis
Kirkil, G., Lower, E. E., & Baughman, R. P. (2018) · Chest · doi:10.1016/j.chest.2017.07.008 · Cited by 243
Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Sarcoidosis: A Review
Belperio, J. A., Shaikh, F., Abtin, F. G., Fishbein, M. C., Weigt, S. S., Saggar, R., & Lynch, J. P. (2022) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2022.1570 · Cited by 191
Metadata
- Authors
- Swigris, J. J., Olson, A. L., Huie, T. J., Fernandez-Perez, E. R., Solomon, J., Sprunger, D., & Brown, K. K.
- Venue
- American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-06-01
- Volume
- 183
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1524-1530
- ISSN
- 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-4970
- OpenAlex
- W2153818922
- Cited by
- 400
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sarcoidosis-related Mortality in the United States from 1988 to 2007. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.201010-1679oc
- The paper
- Swigris, J. J., Olson, A. L., Huie, T. J., Fernandez-Perez, E. R., Solomon, J., Sprunger, D., & Brown, K. K. (2011). Sarcoidosis-related Mortality in the United States from 1988 to 2007. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201010-1679oc
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.