The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluation of the Xpert MTB/RIF Assay for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis in a High HIV Prevalence Setting
Abstract
RATIONALE: Xpert MTB/RIF is a novel automated molecular diagnostic recently endorsed by the World Health Organization. However, performance-related data from high HIV prevalence settings are limited. OBJECTIVES: The impact of sample-related factors on performance and the significance of Xpert MTB/RIF-positive culture-negative discordance remain unclear. METHODS: Xpert MTB/RIF was evaluated using single archived spot-sputum samples from 496 South African patients with suspected TB. Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture positivity and phenotypic resistance to rifampicin served as reference standards. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Overall, Xpert MTB/RIF detected 95% (95% confidence interval [CI], 88-98%; 89 of 94) of smear-positive culture-positive cases and the specificity was 94% (91-96%; 320 of 339). The sensitivity in smear-negative cases was 55% (35-73%; 12 of 22) when the analysis was restricted to 1 ml of unprocessed sputum and culture time-to-positivity of less than or equal to 28 days. Compared with smear microscopy (n=94), Xpert MTB/RIF detected an additional 17 cases (n=111) representing an 18% (11-27%; 111 vs. 94) relative increase in the rapid TB case detection rate. Moreover, compared with smear microscopy, the inclusion of Xpert MTB/RIF-positive culture-negative TB cases (ruled-in by an alternative diagnostic method) resulted in the detection of a further 16 cases (n=127), thus significantly increasing the rapid TB case detection rate to 35% (95% CI, 26-45%; 94 to 111 vs. 94 to 127; P<0.01), the overall specificity to 99.1% (97-100%; 320 of 323; P<0.001), and sensitivity in smear-negative TB to 60% (P=0.12). Performance strongly correlated with smear status and culture time-to-positivity. In patients infected with HIV compared with patients uninfected with HIV Xpert MTB/RIF showed a trend to reduced sensitivity (P=0.09) and significantly reduced negative predictive value (P=0.01). The negative predictive value for rifampicin resistance was 99.4%. CONCLUSIONS: XpertMTB/RIF outperformed smear microscopy, established a diagnosis in a significant proportion of patients with smear-negative TB, detected many highly likely TB cases missed by culture, and accurately ruled out rifampicin-resistant TB. Sample-specific factors had limited impact on performance. Performance in patients infected with HIV, especially those with advanced immunosuppression, warrants further study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rapid Molecular Detection of Tuberculosis and Rifampin Resistance
Boehme, C. C., Nabeta, P., Hillemann, D., Nicol, M. P., Shenai, S., Krapp, F., Allen, J., Tahirli, R., Blakemore, R., Rustomjee, R., et al. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0907847 · Cited by 2,309
Evaluation of the analytical performance of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay
Blakemore, R., Story, E., Helb, D., Kop, J., Banada, P., Owens, M. R., Chakravorty, S., Jones, M., & Alland, D. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.00128-10 · Cited by 485
Cited by
Dorman, S. E., Schumacher, S. G., Alland, D., Nabeta, P., Armstrong, D. T., King, B., Hall, S. L., Chakravorty, S., Cirillo, D. M., Tukvadze, N., et al. (2018) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(17)30691-6 · Cited by 689
Clinical validation of Xpert MTB/RIF for the diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis
Tortoli, E., Russo, C., Piersimoni, C., Mazzola, E., Dal Monte, P., Pascarella, M., Borroni, E., Mondo, A., Piana, F., Scarparo, C., et al. (2012) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.00176311 · Cited by 322
Rapid molecular TB diagnosis: evidence, policy making and global implementation of Xpert MTB/RIF
Weyer, K., Mirzayev, F., Migliori, G. B., Van Gemert, W., D'Ambrosio, L., Zignol, M., Floyd, K., Centis, R., Cirillo, D. M., Tortoli, E., et al. (2013) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.00157212 · Cited by 256
Xpert® MTB/RIF assay for pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults
Steingart, K. R., Sohn, H., Schiller, I., Kloda, L. A., Boehme, C. C., Pai, M., & Dendukuri, N. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd009593.pub2 · Cited by 253
Self-citationEvaluation of GeneXpert MTB/RIF for Diagnosis of Tuberculous Meningitis
Nhu, N. T. Q., Heemskerk, D., Thu, D. D. A., Chau, T. T. H., Mai, N. T. H., Nghia, H. D. T., Loc, P. P., Ha, D. T. M., Merson, L., Thinh, T. T. V., et al. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.01834-13 · Cited by 244
Metadata
- Authors
- Theron, G., Peter, J., van Zyl-Smit, R., Mishra, H., Streicher, E., Murray, S., Dawson, R., Whitelaw, A., Hoelscher, M., Sharma, S., Pai, M., Warren, R., & Dheda, K.
- Venue
- American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-07-01
- Volume
- 184
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 132-140
- ISSN
- 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-4970
- OpenAlex
- W2109454960
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 22.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of the Xpert MTB/RIF Assay for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis in a High HIV Prevalence Setting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.201101-0056oc
- The paper
- Theron, G., Peter, J., van Zyl-Smit, R., Mishra, H., Streicher, E., Murray, S., Dawson, R., Whitelaw, A., Hoelscher, M., Sharma, S., Pai, M., Warren, R., & Dheda, K. (2011). Evaluation of the Xpert MTB/RIF Assay for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis in a High HIV Prevalence Setting. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201101-0056oc
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.