Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 716

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Reslizumab for Poorly Controlled, Eosinophilic Asthma: A Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study

Castro, Mario, Mathur, Sameer, Hargreave, Frederick, Boulet, Louis-Philippe, Xie, Fang, Young, James, Wilkins, H. Jeffrey, Henkel, Timothy, Nair, Parameswaran·2011·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

RATIONALE: Eosinophilic asthma is a phenotype of asthma characterized by the persistence of eosinophils in the airways. IL-5 is involved in the activation and survival of eosinophils. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of the antibody to IL-5, reslizumab, in patients with eosinophilic asthma that is poorly controlled with high-dose inhaled corticosteroid. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive infusions of reslizumab at 3.0 mg/kg (n = 53) or placebo (n = 53) at baseline and at Weeks 4, 8, and 12, with stratification by baseline Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) score less than or equal to 2 or greater than 2. The primary efficacy measure was the difference between the reslizumab and placebo groups in the change in ACQ score from baseline to end of therapy (Week 15 or early withdrawal). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mean changes from baseline to end of therapy in ACQ score were -0.7 in the reslizumab group and -0.3 in the placebo group (P = 0.054) and in FEV(1) were 0.18 and -0.08 L, respectively (P = 0.002). In those patients with nasal polyps, the changes in ACQ score were -1.0 and -0.1, respectively (P = 0.012). Median percentage reductions from baseline in sputum eosinophils were 95.4 and 38.7%, respectively (P = 0.007). Eight percent of patients in the reslizumab group and 19% of patients in the placebo group had an asthma exacerbation (P = 0.083). The most common adverse events with reslizumab were nasopharyngitis, fatigue, and pharyngolaryngeal pain. CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving reslizumab showed significantly greater reductions in sputum eosinophils, improvements in airway function, and a trend toward greater asthma control than those receiving placebo. Reslizumab was generally well tolerated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.201103-0396oc

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 716

Metadata

Authors
Castro, M., Mathur, S., Hargreave, F., Boulet, L.-P., Xie, F., Young, J., Wilkins, H. J., Henkel, T., & Nair, P.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2011-11-15
Volume
184
Issue
10
Pages
1125-1132
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W1916962812
Cited by
716
References
0
FWCI
30.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reslizumab for Poorly Controlled, Eosinophilic Asthma: A Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.201103-0396oc
The paper
Castro, M., Mathur, S., Hargreave, F., Boulet, L.-P., Xie, F., Young, J., Wilkins, H. J., Henkel, T., & Nair, P. (2011). Reslizumab for Poorly Controlled, Eosinophilic Asthma: A Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201103-0396oc

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.