Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 309

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Dose-Ranging Trial to Optimize the Dose of Rifampin in the Treatment of Tuberculosis

Open access
Boeree, Martin J., Diacon, Andreas H., Dawson, Rodney, Narunsky, Kim, du Bois, Jeannine, Venter, Amour, Phillips, Patrick P. J., Gillespie, Stephen H., McHugh, Timothy D., Hoelscher, Michael, Heinrich, Norbert, Rehal, Sunita, van Soolingen, Dick, van Ingen, Jakko, Magis-Escurra, Cecile, Burger, David, Plemper van Balen, Georgette, Aarnoutse, Rob E.·2015·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

RATIONALE: Rifampin at a dose of 10 mg/kg was introduced in 1971 based on pharmacokinetic, toxicity, and cost considerations. Available data in mice and humans showed that an increase in dose may shorten the duration of tuberculosis treatment. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and tolerability, the pharmacokinetics, and the extended early bactericidal activity of increasing doses of rifampin. METHODS: Patients with drug-susceptible tuberculosis were enrolled into a control group of eight patients receiving the standard dose of 10 mg/kg rifampin, followed by consecutive experimental groups with 15 patients each receiving rifampin 20, 25, 30, and 35 mg/kg, respectively, for 14 days. In all patients isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol were added in standard doses for the second 7 days of treatment. Safety, pharmacokinetics of rifampin, and fall in bacterial load were assessed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Grade 1 and 2 adverse events were equally distributed between the five dose groups; there were five grade 3 events of which one was a possibly related hepatotoxicity. Areas under the time-concentration curves and peak serum concentrations of rifampin showed a more than proportional increase with dose. The daily fall in bacterial load over 14 days was 0.176, 0.168, 0.167, 0.265, and 0.261 log10 colony-forming units/ml sputum in the 10, 20, 25, 30, and 35 mg/kg groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Two weeks of rifampin up to 35 mg/kg was safe and well tolerated. There was a nonlinear increase in exposure to rifampin without an apparent ceiling effect and a greater estimated fall in bacterial load in the higher dosing groups. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 01392911).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.201407-1264oc

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

See all 309

Metadata

Authors
Boeree, M. J., Diacon, A. H., Dawson, R., Narunsky, K., du Bois, J., Venter, A., Phillips, P. P. J., Gillespie, S. H., McHugh, T. D., Hoelscher, M., Heinrich, N., Rehal, S., van Soolingen, D., van Ingen, J., Magis-Escurra, C., Burger, D., Plemper van Balen, G., & Aarnoutse, R. E.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2015-05-01
Volume
191
Issue
9
Pages
1058-1065
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2143942591
Cited by
309
References
23
FWCI
27.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Dose-Ranging Trial to Optimize the Dose of Rifampin in the Treatment of Tuberculosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.201407-1264oc
The paper
Boeree, M. J., Diacon, A. H., Dawson, R., Narunsky, K., du Bois, J., Venter, A., Phillips, P. P. J., Gillespie, S. H., McHugh, T. D., Hoelscher, M., Heinrich, N., Rehal, S., van Soolingen, D., van Ingen, J., Magis-Escurra, C., Burger, D., Plemper van Balen, G., & Aarnoutse, R. E. (2015). A Dose-Ranging Trial to Optimize the Dose of Rifampin in the Treatment of Tuberculosis. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201407-1264oc

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.