Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 444

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 99 of the 99 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An Update on Management of Adult Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline

Open access
Qadir, Nida, Sahetya, Sarina, Munshi, Laveena, Summers, Charlotte, Abrams, Darryl, Beitler, Jeremy, Bellani, Giacomo, Brower, Roy G., Burry, Lisa, Chen, Jen-Ting, Hodgson, Carol, Hough, Catherine L., Lamontagne, Francois, Law, Anica, Papazian, Laurent, Pham, Tai, Rubin, Eileen, Siuba, Matthew, Telias, Irene, Patolia, Setu, Chaudhuri, Dipayan, Walkey, Allan, Rochwerg, Bram, Fan, Eddy·2024·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

Background: This document updates previously published Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), incorporating new evidence addressing the use of corticosteroids, venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, neuromuscular blocking agents, and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). Methods: We summarized evidence addressing four “PICO questions” (patient, intervention, comparison, and outcome). A multidisciplinary panel with expertise in ARDS used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework to develop clinical recommendations. Results: We suggest the use of: 1) corticosteroids for patients with ARDS (conditional recommendation, moderate certainty of evidence), 2) venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in selected patients with severe ARDS (conditional recommendation, low certainty of evidence), 3) neuromuscular blockers in patients with early severe ARDS (conditional recommendation, low certainty of evidence), and 4) higher PEEP without lung recruitment maneuvers as opposed to lower PEEP in patients with moderate to severe ARDS (conditional recommendation, low to moderate certainty), and 5) we recommend against using prolonged lung recruitment maneuvers in patients with moderate to severe ARDS (strong recommendation, moderate certainty). Conclusions: We provide updated evidence-based recommendations for the management of ARDS. Individual patient and illness characteristics should be factored into clinical decision making and implementation of these recommendations while additional evidence is generated from much-needed clinical trials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.202311-2011st

Cites

99 of 99 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 99 references

Cited by

See all 444

Metadata

Authors
Qadir, N., Sahetya, S., Munshi, L., Summers, C., Abrams, D., Beitler, J., Bellani, G., Brower, R. G., Burry, L., Chen, J.-T., Hodgson, C., Hough, C. L., Lamontagne, F., Law, A., Papazian, L., Pham, T., Rubin, E., Siuba, M., Telias, I., Patolia, S., Chaudhuri, D., Walkey, A., Rochwerg, B., & Fan, E.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2024-01-01
Volume
209
Issue
1
Pages
24-36
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W4389179209
Cited by
444
References
99
FWCI
70.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Update on Management of Adult Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.202311-2011st
The paper
Qadir, N., Sahetya, S., Munshi, L., Summers, C., Abrams, D., Beitler, J., Bellani, G., Brower, R. G., Burry, L., Chen, J.-T., Hodgson, C., Hough, C. L., Lamontagne, F., Law, A., Papazian, L., Pham, T., Rubin, E., Siuba, M., Telias, I., . . . Fan, E. (2024). An Update on Management of Adult Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202311-2011st

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.