Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 221

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Can GOLD Stage 0 Provide Information of Prognostic Value in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease?

Vestbo, Jørgen, Lange, Peter·2002·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

In the recently published guidelines of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the staging system included a Stage 0 for subjects without airways obstruction but with respiratory symptoms, denoting these subjects “at risk” for COPD. Our aim was to validate this staging approach using data from three surveys in The Copenhagen City Heart Study, in which a sample of the general population was examined at baseline and in which, after 5 and 15 years, spirometry was performed at all surveys. Criteria for GOLD Stage 0 was fulfilled by 5.8% of the total adult population and 7.2% of smokers. After 5 and 15 years, 13.2 and 20.5%, respectively, of smokers with GOLD Stage 0 had developed COPD fulfilling criteria for GOLD Stage 1 or worse. This was the case for 11.6 and 18.5%, respectively, of smokers without respiratory symptoms. Further analyses using multivariate logistic regression analysis confirmed that GOLD Stage 0 was not identifying subsequent airways obstruction. When analyzing FEV1 decline, Stage 0 carried a risk of excess decline. GOLD Stage 0 was not a stable feature, which may explain the lack of predictive value. In the Western world, smoking is still in itself the most important indicator of risk of COPD, and alternative markers of susceptibility in the population must be investigated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.2112048

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. 2001, Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 163, 1256, 10.1164/ajrccm.163.5.2101039 · DOI
  2. 2001, Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 163, 1047, 10.1164/ajrccm.163.5.ed1101e · DOI
  3. 1995, Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 152, S77
  4. 1995, Eur Respir J, 8, 1398, 10.1183/09031936.95.08081398 · DOI
  5. 1997, Thorax, 52, S1, 10.1136/thx.52.2008.S1.5 · DOI
  6. 1996, Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 153, 1530, 10.1164/ajrccm.153.5.8630597 · DOI
  7. 1989, Scand J Soc Med, 170(Suppl 41), 1
  8. 1991, Eur Respir J, 4, 1080, 10.1183/09031936.93.04091080 · DOI
  9. 1990, Thorax, 45, 579, 10.1136/thx.45.8.579 · DOI
  10. 2000, Chest, 117, 326S, 10.1378/chest.117.5_suppl_2.326S · DOI
  11. 1986, Eur J Respir Dis, 69, 46
  12. 1988, Am Rev Respir Dis, 137, 293, 10.1164/ajrccm/137.2.293 · DOI
  13. 1998, Chest, 114, 416, 10.1378/chest.114.2.416 · DOI
  14. 1997, Eur Respir J, 10, 822, 10.1183/09031936.97.10040822 · DOI
  15. 2000, Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 162, 2152, 10.1164/ajrccm.162.6.2003112 · DOI

Cited by

See all 221

Metadata

Authors
Vestbo, J., & Lange, P.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2002-08-01
Volume
166
Issue
3
Pages
329-332
ISSN
  • 1073-449X
  • 1535-4970
Cited by
221
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Can GOLD Stage 0 Provide Information of Prognostic Value in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.2112048
The paper
Vestbo, J., & Lange, P. (2002). Can GOLD Stage 0 Provide Information of Prognostic Value in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease? American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.2112048

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.