The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Moss diversity: A molecular phylogenetic analysis of genera
Abstract
In this study we present phylogenetic and molecular phylogenetic diversity analyses of moss taxa from a total of 655 genera of mosses. Three loci were sampled: chloroplast ribosomal small protein 4, the intronic region of the mitochondrial NADH dehydogenase subunit 5, and partial sequences of the nuclear 26S ribosomal RNA. Maximum likelihood and Bayesian phylogenetic analyses were performed on individual loci and on multilocus data sets. A measure of phylogenetic diversity was calculated and constrasted among major lineages of mosses. We reveal many instances of incongruence among genomic partitions, but, overall, our analyses describe relationships largely congruent with previous studies of the major groups of mosses. Moreover, our greater sampling highlights the possible non-monophyly of many taxonomic families, particularly in the haplolepideous and pleurocarpous mosses. Comparisons of taxic and phylogenetic diversity among genera indicate that the Dicranidae (haplolepideous taxa) include about 15% of moss genera, but nearly 30% of the phylogenetic diversity. By contrast, the Hypnanae (hypnalian pleurocarps) contain about 45% of moss genera, but a lower percentage of phylogenetic diversity. Agreement between numbers of genera and phylogenetic diversity within other moss clades are remarkably consistent.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bayesian Model Adequacy and Choice in Phylogenetics
Bollback, J. P. (2002) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004175 · Cited by 215
Cited by
The number of known plants species in the world and its annual increase
CHRISTENHUSZ, M. J. M., & BYNG, J. W. (2016) · Phytotaxa · doi:10.11646/phytotaxa.261.3.1 · Cited by 2,113
Metadata
- Authors
- Cox, C. J., Goffinet, B., Wickett, N. J., Boles, S. B., & Shaw, A. J.
- Venue
- Phytotaxa
- Publisher
- Magnolia Press
- Published
- 2014-09-30
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 175-195
- ISSN
- 1179-3155 (ISSN-L)
- 1179-3163
- OpenAlex
- W2144168664
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Moss diversity: A molecular phylogenetic analysis of genera. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.11646/phytotaxa.9.1.10
- The paper
- Cox, C. J., Goffinet, B., Wickett, N. J., Boles, S. B., & Shaw, A. J. (2014). Moss diversity: A molecular phylogenetic analysis of genera. Phytotaxa. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.9.1.10
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.