Cited by 54Invertebrate Taxonomy and EcologyMarine Biology and Ecology ResearchComparative Animal Anatomy Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.

Phylogeny of Eunicida (Annelida) based on morphology of jaws

Open access
PAXTON, HANNELORE·2009·Zoosymposia

Abstract

Eunicida have a complex jaw apparatus with a fossil record dating back to the latest Cambrian. Traditionally, Eunicidae, Onuphidae, and Lumbrineridae were considered closely related families having labidognath maxillae, whereas Oenonidae with prionognath type maxillae were thought to be derived. Molecular phylogenies place Oenonidae with Eunicidae/Onuphidae, and Lumbrineridae as the most basal taxon. Re-evaluation of the jaw types based on morphology and ontogeny demonstrated that the labidognaths Eunicidae and Onuphidae have a closer relationship to the prionognath Oenonidae than was previously thought. Lumbrineridae are neither labidognath nor prionognath; therefore a new type, Symmetrognatha, is proposed. Homologies of jaw elements and considerations of functional aspects of the jaw apparatus are explored to present a hypothesis of the Eunicida phylogeny. The earliest fossils are of placognath and ctenognath types, lacking maxillary carriers. While the former are extinct, the latter are represented by the extant Dorvilleidae. The interpretation of relationships between the carrier-bearing families depends on whether the carriers are thought to have evolved once only or twice independently. The similarity of the carrier structure and their associated muscles suggests the former, placing the Lumbrineridae as sister to Eunicidae/Onuphidae and Oenonidae. However, the ontogeny of the eunicid/onuphid apparatus as well as its adult structure differ greatly from those of lumbrinerids, indicating that the lumbrinerid carriers may have evolved independently and earlier than in eunicids/onuphids and oenonids.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.11646/zoosymposia.2.1.18

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Borradaile, L.A. (1901) On the spawn and young of a polychaete worm of the genus Marphysa. Proceedings of the Zoological Society London, 2, 714-720.
  2. Carrrera-Parra, L.F. (2003) Redescription of Hartmaniella tulearensis n. comb. (Amoureux, 1978) with comments on Hartmaniella sp. and affinities of the family (Polychaeta: Hartmaniellidae). Journal of Natural History, 37, 49-55.
  3. Colbath, G. K. (1989) Revision of the family Lysaretidae, and recognition of the family Oenonidae Kinberg, 1865 (Eunicida: Polychaeta). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 102, 116-123.
  4. Edgar, D.R. (1984) Polychaetes of the Lower and Middle Paleozoic: a multi-element analysis and a phylogenetic outline. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, 43, 255-284.
  5. Fewkes, J.W. (1885) On the development of certain worm larvae. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology Harvard, 11, 168-208.
  6. Gould, S.J. (1977) Ontogeny and phylogeny. Harvard University Press, Cambridge and London. 501 pp.
  7. Hall, K. A., Hutchings, P.A. & Colgan, D.J. (2004) Further phylogenetic studies of the Polychaeta using 18S rDNA sequence data. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the U.K., 84, 949-960.
  8. Herpin, R. (1925) Recherches biologiques sur la reproduction & le développement de quelques annelids polychètes. Bulletin Société Scientifique Nationale de l'Ouest, ser. 4, 5, 1-250.
  9. Hilbig, B. (1995) Family Dorvilleidae Chamberlin, 1919. In: Blake, J.A., Hilbig, B. & Scott, P.H. (Eds.), Taxonomic Atlas of the Benthic Fauna of the Santa Maria Basin and the Western Santa Barbara Channel. Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, Santa Barbara, California, pp. 341-364.
  10. Hints, O. & Nolvak, J. (2006) Early Ordovician scolecodonts and chitinozoans from Tallinn, North Estonia. Review of Palaeobotany & Palynology, 139, 189-209.
  11. Hsieh, H.-L. & Simon, J. L. (1987) Larval development of Kinbergonuphis simoni, with a summary of development patterns in the family Onuphidae (Polychaeta). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 7, 194-210.
  12. Jumars, P. (1974) A generic revision of the Dorvilleidae (Polychaeta), with six new species from the deep North Pacific. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 54, 101-135.
  13. Lu, H. & Fauchald, K. (2000) Ophryotrocha lipscombae, a new species and a possible connection between ctenognath and labidognath-prionognath eunicean worms (Polychaeta). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 113, 486-492.
  14. Okuda, S. (1946) Studies on the development of Annelida Polychaeta. Journal of the Faculty of Sciences Hokkaido Imperial University, 9, 115-219.
  15. Paxton, H. (2000) Eunicida. In: Beesley, P. L., Ross, G.J.B. & Glasby, C.J. (Eds.), Polychaetes and Allies: The Southern Synthesis. Vol. 4A: Polychaeta, Myzostomida, Pogonophora, Echiura, Sipuncula. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, pp. 89-106.
  16. Rouse, G. & Pleijel, F. (2001) Polychaetes. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 354 pp.
  17. Struck, T.H., Hessling, R. & Purschke, G. (2002a) The phylogenetic position of Aeolosomatidae and Parergodrilidae, two enigmatic oligochaete-like taxa of the "Polychaeta," based on molecular data from 18S rDNA sequences. Journal of Zoological Systematic and Evolutionary Research, 40, 155-163.
  18. Szaniawski, H. (1996) Scolecodonts. In: Jansonius J.& McGregor D.C. (Eds.), Palynology: Principles and applications. American Association of Stratigraphic Palynologists Foundation, Vol. 1, pp. 337-354.
  19. Webby, B.D., Cooper, R.A., Bergström, S.M. & Paris, F. (2004). Stratigraphic framework and time slices. In: Webby, B.D., Paris, F., Droser, M.L. & Percival, I.G. (Eds.), The Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 41-47.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 54

Metadata

Authors
PAXTON, H.
Affiliations
Macquarie University (AU)
Corresponding author
PAXTON, HANNELORE
Venue
Zoosymposia
Published
2009-08-31
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
241-264
ISSN
  • 1178-9905 (ISSN-L)
  • 1178-9913
OpenAlex
W2149051134
Cited by
54
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Zoosymposia (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Smithsonian Institution
  • Flinders University
  • Lunds Universitet
  • Tallinna Tehnikaülikool
  • Norsk Institutt for Vannforskning
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine Biology and Ecology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anatomy › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
Keywords
Eunicida, Onuphidae, Lumbrineridae, Oenonidae, jaw morphology, maxilla, phylogenetic relationships, Dorvilleidae, Annelida, Eunicidae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phylogeny of Eunicida (Annelida) based on morphology of jaws. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.11646/zoosymposia.2.1.18
The paper
PAXTON, H. (2009). Phylogeny of Eunicida (Annelida) based on morphology of jaws. Zoosymposia. https://doi.org/10.11646/zoosymposia.2.1.18