Cited by 26Evolution and Paleontology StudiesAvian ecology and behaviorPlant Diversity and Evolution

Phylogeny and new taxonomy of the booted eagles (Accipitriformes: Aquilinae)

Open access
LERNER, HEATHER, CHRISTIDIS, LES, GAMAUF, ANITA, GRIFFITHS, CAROLE, HARING, ELISABETH, HUDDLESTON, CHRISTOPHER J., KABRA, SONIA, KOCUM, ANNETT +8 more·2017·Zootaxa

Abstract

We present a phylogeny of all booted eagles (38 extant and one extinct species) based on analysis of published sequences from seven loci. We find molecular support for five major clades within the booted eagles: Nisaetus (10 species), Spizaetus (4 species), Clanga (3 species), Hieraaetus (6 species) and Aquila (11 species), requiring generic changes for 14 taxa. Additionally, we recommend that the Long-crested Eagle (Lophaetus occipitalis) and the Black Eagle (Ictinaetus malaiensis) remain in their monotypic genera, due to their distinctive morphology. We apply the recently resurrected genus Clanga for the spotted eagles (previously Aquila spp.) to resolve the paraphyly of the genus Aquila such that the clade including the Booted Eagle (H. pennatus), Little Eagle (H. morphnoides), Pygmy Eagle (H. weiskei), Ayres's Eagle (H. ayresii) and Wahlberg's Eagle (H. wahlbergi) can remain in the genus Hieraaetus. The Rufous-bellied Eagle should be retained in the genus Lophotriorchis. For consistency in English names, we recommend that the term "hawk-eagles" be used only for the species in the genera Nisaetus and Spizaetus. We suggest following new or modified English names: Cassin's Eagle (Aquila africana), Bonaparte's Eagle (A. spilogaster), Ayres's Eagle (Hieraaetus ayresii), and Black-and-chestnut Hawk-Eagle (Spizaetus isidori).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.11646/zootaxa.4216.4.1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
LERNER, H., CHRISTIDIS, L., GAMAUF, A., GRIFFITHS, C., HARING, E., HUDDLESTON, C. J., KABRA, S., KOCUM, A., KROSBY, M., KVALØY, K., MINDELL, D., RASMUSSEN, P., RØV, N., WADLEIGH, R., WINK, M., & GJERSHAUG, J. O.
Affiliations
  • Earlham College (US)
  • Southern Cross University (AU)
  • Natural History Museum Vienna (AT)
  • American Museum of Natural History (US)
  • Smithsonian Institution (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
  • Museum of Vertebrate Zoology (US)
  • Natural History Museum (GB)
  • Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NO)
Venue
Zootaxa
Published
2017-01-09
Volume
4216
Issue
4
Pages
zootaxa.4216.4.1-zootaxa.4216.4.1
ISSN
  • 1175-5326 (ISSN-L)
  • 1175-5334
OpenAlex
W2571304221
Cited by
26
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 9
FWCI
2.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Zootaxa (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Cross Connect (Southern Cross University) (submittedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Gateway Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant Diversity and Evolution
Keywords
Booted Eagle
MeSH terms
Animals, Phylogeny, Eagles, Animal Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review