Universal Design for Learning as a Tool for Inclusion in the Higher Education Classroom: Tips for the Next Decade of Implementation
Open accessAbstract
Universal Design for Learning (UDL) has gained significant momentum in Higher Education (HE) over the last decade in North America. It offers considerable potential to achieve the inclusion of diverse students in the HE classroom. It is a unique approach, first because it shifts the instructor mindset away from medical model practices, and second because it allows the development of inclusive practices that address the needs of the full spectrum of diverse learners. As a result of this growing interest, there have been implementation efforts within a wide range of disciplines and settings in post-secondary education. The time has come, however, to identify the challenges that remain, to seek appropriate solutions, and to develop strategic direction to shape UDL adoption for the next decade. This paper draws on phenomenological data collected by the author on his own practice through a process of auto-ethnography. This data emerges from three dimensions of the author’s practice: his past role as manager of an accessibility unit, as well as his current role as UDL consultant within HE, and faculty member exploring UDL in his own teaching. The chapter identifies remaining challenges, explores solutions, and frames a vision for what UDL development might look like in HE over the next decade.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reasonable adjustments remain necessary, but proactive planning of teaching methods, materials, assessment options and digital environments can normalise access.
“Reasonable adjustments remain necessary, but proactive planning of teaching methods, materials, assessment options and digital environments can normalise access [10,21].”
From Inclusive Higher Education and Disability: Policy–Implementation Gaps Across Universities in Mexico and Colombia (2026) · cites this paper as [21]
Section 2.1 describes UDL as advance redesign of instruction and assessment; sections 4.1.1 and 4.1.2 discuss accessible digital materials, flexible resources, and assessment choices for diverse learners. These passages support the proactive-planning and broader-access part of the claim, but the paper does not state that reasonable adjustments remain necessary alongside UDL. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Evidence for a mental health crisis in graduate education
Evans, T. M., Bira, L., Gastelum, J. B., Weiss, L. T., & Vanderford, N. L. (2018) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4089 · Cited by 1,441 · see citing works
Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8 · Cited by 1,097 · see citing works
Bonaccio, S., Connelly, C. E., Gellatly, I. R., Jetha, A., & Martin Ginis, K. A. (2020) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-018-9602-5 · Cited by 491 · cited 1× · see citing works
“UDL, this far, has remained conspicuously absent from the literature on learner diversity in trades education [60].”
BackgroundEffects of Assistive Technology for Students with Reading and Writing Disabilities
Svensson, I., Nordström, T., Lindeblad, E., Gustafson, S., Björn, M., Sand, C., Almgren/Bäck, G., & Nilsson, S. (2021) · Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology · doi:10.1080/17483107.2019.1646821 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Dalton, E. M., Lyner-Cleophas, M., Ferguson, B. T., & McKenzie, J. (2019) · African Journal of Disability · doi:10.4102/ajod.v8i0.519 · Cited by 162 · cited 2× · see citing works
“UDL has emerged from a concept called Universal Design (UD) which was developed by the field of architecture in the 1970s [7].”
BackgroundStudent engagement in neo-liberal times: what is missing?
Zepke, N. (2018) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2017.1370440 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Ismail, A., & Kuppusamy, K. S. (2022) · Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jksuci.2019.03.011 · Cited by 108 · cited 1× · see citing works
“It has also meant developing know-how among faculty around the issues of web accessibility so that online resources used meet web accessibility standards [32].”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 61
- Knarlag, K. and B. Walters, Universal Design for Learning - Licence to Learn (UDLL): a European perspective on UDL (2020), The AHEAD Journal, 11.
- Oliveira, A., M. Munster and A. Gonçalves. (2019) Universal Design for Learning and Inclusive Education: a Systematic Review in the International Literature. RevistaBrasileira de Educação Especial, 25 (4): 675-690.
- Fovet, F. (2019) Not just about disability: Getting traction for UDL implementation with International Students. In: K. Novak & S. Bracken (Eds.) Transforming Higher Education through Universal Design for Learning: An International Perspective. London: Routledge.
- Fovet, F. (2020) Using Universal Design for Learning to Create Inclusive Provisions for Indigenous Students in Higher Education -Decolonizing Teaching Practices. In: L. Roberts (Ed.), Redesigning Learning, Leadership, and Indigenous Education in the 21st Century. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
- Ives, J., and M. Castillo-Montoya. (2020) First-Generation College Students as Academic Learners: A Systematic Review. Review of Educational Research, 90 (2): 139-178.
- Oswald, S. K. (2019). Breaking the Exclusionary Boundary between User Experience and Access: Steps toward Making UX Inclusive Of Users with Disabilities. Proceedings of the 37th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication, 1-8.
- Aizpurua, A., Harper, S., & Vigo, M. (2016). Exploring the relationship between web accessibility and user experience. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 91, 13-23.
- Rao, K., &Meo, G. (2016). Using Universal Design for Learning to Design Standards-Based Lessons. SAGE Open.
- Wilson, J. (2017) Reimagining Disability and Inclusive Education through Universal Design for Learning. Disability Studies Quarterly, 37 (2).
- Ok, M., Rao, K, Bryant, B., & McDougall, D. (2017) Universal Design for Learning in Pre-K to Grade 12 Classrooms: A Systematic Review of Research. Exceptionality, 25 (2), 116-138.
- Houghton, M. &Fovet, F. (2012) Reframing Disability, reshaping the provision of services. Communiqué, 13 (1), 16-19.
- McGrath, C., Roxå, T., &Laksov, K. (2019) Change in a culture of collegiality and consensus-seeking: a double-edged sword. Higher Education Research & Development, 38 (5), 1001-1014.
- Cassell, M., &Halaseh, O. (2014) The Impact of Unionization on University Performance. Journal of Collective Bargaining in the Academy, 6, Article 3.
- Fovet, F. (in print) Developing an Ecological Approach to Strategic UDL Implementation in Higher Education. Journal of Education and Teaching.
- Schreffler, J., Vasquez III, E., Chini, J., & James, W. (2019) Universal Design for Learning in postsecondary STEM education for students with disabilities: a systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6, 8.
- Tobin, T. J. (2019). Reaching all learners through their phones and universal design for learning. Journal of Adult Learning, Knowledge and Innovation JALKI, 1-11.
- Bock, G., Gesser, M., &Nuernberg, A. (2018). Universal Design for Learning: Scientific Production in the Period from 2011 to 2016. RevistaBrasileira de Educação Especial, 24 (1), 143-160.
- Song, Y. (2016) To what extent is Universal Design for Learning "universal"? A case study in township special needs schools in South Africa. Disability and the Global South, 3 (1), 910-929.
- Fovet, F. (2017) Access, Universal Design and Sustainability of Teaching Practices: a Powerful Synchronicity of Concepts at a Crucial Conjuncture for Higher Education. Indonesian Journal of Disability Studies (IJDS), 4 (2), 118-129.
- Dall'Alba, G. (2009). Phenomenology and education: An introduction. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 41 (1), 7-9.
- Lynch, S., & Kuntz, A. (2019) 'A critical autoethnography of a doctoral students' research journey: learning to take risks in the academy'. Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education, 10 (2), 156-171.
- Kennette, L., & Wilson, A. (2019) Universal Design for Learning (UDL): What is it and how do I implement it?Transformative Dialogues: Teaching & Learning Journal, 12 (1).
- Washington, G. Y. (2019). The Learning Management System Matters in Face-to-Face Higher Education Courses. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 48 (2), 255-275.
- Fovet, F. (2018) Making do with what we have: using the built in functions of a Learning Management System to implement UDL. The AHEAD Journal, 7, 1-17.
- Hollingshead, A., & Carr-Chellman, D. (2019, February) Engaging Learners in Online Environments Utilizing Universal Design for Learning Principles. E-Learn Magazine. Retrieved from: https://elearnmag.acm.org/featured.cfm?aid=3310383.
- O'Neil, G. (2017). It's not fair! Students and staff views on the equity of the procedures and outcomes of students' choice of assessment methods. Irish Educational Studies, 36 (2), 221- 236.
- Morris, C., Milton, E., & Goldstone, R. (2019) Case study: suggesting choice: inclusive assessment processes. Higher Education Pedagogies, 4 (1), 435-447.
- Spante, M., Hashemi, S., Lundin, M., &Algers, A. (2018) Digital competence and digital literacy in higher education research: Systematic review of concept use. Cogent Education, 5 (1).
- Ciesielkiewicz, M. (2019) The use of e-portfolios in higher education: From the students' perspective. Issues in Educational Research, 29 (3), 649
- Sewagegn, A., &Diale, B. (2019). Empowering Learners Using Active Learning in Higher Education Institutions. In: S. Brito (Ed.) Active Learning -Beyond the Future. Intech Open. Retrieved from: https://www.intechopen.com/books/active-learning-beyond-th e-future/empowering-learners-using-active-learning-in-higher- education-institutions.
- Dollinger, M., & Lodge, J. (2019) Student-staff co-creation in higher education: an evidence-informed model to support future design and implementation. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management.
- Tight, M. (2019) The neoliberal turn in Higher Education. Higher Education Quarterly, 73, 273-284.
- Solomonides, I. (2013). A relational and multidimensional model of student engagement. In: E. Dunne, & D. Owen (Eds.) The student engagement handbook: Practice in higher E Education, (1st ed., pp. 43-58). Bingley: Emerald.
- Wekullo, C. S. (2019). International undergraduate student engagement: Implications for higher education administrators. Journal of International Students, 9 (1), 320-337.
- Leslie, H. J. (2019) Trifecta of Student Engagement: A framework for an online teaching professional development course for faculty in higher education. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning.
- Serrano, M. M., O'Brien, M., Roberts, K., & Whyte, D. (2018). Critical Pedagogy and assessment in higher education: The ideal of 'authenticity' in learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 19 (1), 9-21.
- Sanger C. S. (2020) Inclusive Pedagogy and Universal Design Approaches for Diverse Learning Environments. In: Sanger C., Gleason N. (eds) Diversity and Inclusion in Global Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore.
- Seok, S., DaCosta, B., & Hodges, R. (2018). A Systematic Review of Empirically Based Universal Design for Learning: Implementation and Effectiveness of Universal Design in Education for Students with and without Disabilities at the Postsecondary Level. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 6, 171-189.
- Capp, M. (2017) The effectiveness of universal design for learning: a meta-analysis of literature between 2013 and 2016. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21 (8), 791-807.
- Inoue-Smith & T. McVey (Eds.) Optimizing Higher Education Learning Through Activities and Assessments. IGI Global: Hershey, PA.
- Kumar, K., &Wideman, M. (2014) Accessible by design: Applying UDL principles in a first year undergraduate course. Canadian Journal of Higher Education/Revue canadienned'enseignementsupérieur, 44 (1), 125-147.
- Miller, D., & Lang, P. (2016) Using the Universal Design for Learning Approach in Science Laboratories To Minimize Student Stress. Journal of Chemical Education, 93 (11), 1823-1828.
- Coleman, S., & Smith, C. (2019) Evaluating the benefits of virtual training for bioscience students. Higher Education Pedagogies, 4 (1), 287-299.
- Bartlett, M., & Ehrlich, S. (2020) How a Universal Design Mindset Can Support Learning in the Workplace. The AHEAD Journal. Retrieved from: https://www.ahead.ie/journal/How-a-Universal-Design-Minds et-Can-Support-Learning-in-the-Workplace.
- Glass, D., Meyer, A., & Rose, D. (2013). Universal Design for Learning and the Arts. Harvard Educational Review, 83, 98-119.
- Barrett, T. (2000). Studio Critiques of Student Art: As They Are, as They Could Be with Mentoring. Theory Into Practice, 39 (1), 29-35.
- Scagnetti, G. (2017) A dialogical model for studio critiques in Design Education. The Design Journal, 20 (1), S781-S791.
- Stensaker, B. (2015) Organizational identity as a concept for understanding university dynamics. Higher Education 69 (1), 103-115.
- Kezar, A. (2013) Understanding sensemaking/sensegiving in transformational change processes from the bottom up. Higher Education, 65 (6), 761-780.
- Mathews, K. (2018) Growing Our Own: Cultivating Faculty Leadership. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 50 (3-4), 88-92.
- Surtees, V. (2019). Challenging Deficit Constructions of the International Student Category in Canadian Higher Education. TESL Canada Journal, 36 (1), 48-70.
- Kieran, L., & Anderson, C. (2019). Connecting Universal Design for Learning with Culturally Responsive Teaching. Education and Urban Society, 51 (9), 1202-1216.
- Terras, K., & Phillips, A. (2015) Disability Accommodations in Online Courses: The Graduate Student Experience. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 28 (3), 329-340 329.
- Johnstone, C., & Edwards, P. (2020). Accommodations, Accessibility, and Culture: Increasing Access to Study Abroad for Students With Disabilities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 24 (4), 424-439.
- Smith, S. J., Rao, K., Lowrey, K. A., Gardner, J. E., Moore, E., Coy, K.,… Wojcik, B. (2019). Recommendations for a National Research Agenda in UDL: Outcomes From the UDL-IRN Preconference on Research. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 30 (3), 174-185.
- Geerlings L., & Lundberg, A. (2018) Global discourses and power/knowledge: theoretical reflections on futures of higher education during the rise of Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 38 (2), 229-240.
- Nieminen, J., &Pesonen, H. (2020) Taking Universal Design Back to Its Roots: Perspectives on Accessibility and Identity in Undergraduate Mathematics. Education Sciences, 10 (1), 12.
- Fovet, F. (2014) Navigating the delicate emerging synchronicity between inclusion and access. LEARNing Landscapes, 7 (2), 17-24.
- Third Pan-Canadian Conference on UDL (2019) Connecting the Dots -Sharing Promising Practices across Country. http://www.udlcanada.ca/index.html.
- Greenhow, C., Campbell, D., Galvin, S. & Askari, E. (2018). Social Media in Teacher Professional Development: A Literature Review. In E. Langran& J. Borup (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2256-2264).
- Bruguera, C., Guitert, M., & Romeu, T. (2019). Social media and professional development: a systematic review. Research in Learning Technology, 27.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Carrillo-Sierra, S.-M., Munda Magill, F., & Rivera-Porras, D. (2026) · Societies · doi:10.3390/soc16070222
- Authors
- Fovet, F.
- Venue
- Education Journal
- Publisher
- Science Publishing Group
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 163
- ISSN
- 2327-2600 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3120639244
- Cited by
- 72
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6
- FWCI
- 9.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Education Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
- Social Sciences › Education › Inclusive Education and Diversity
- Keywords
- Universal Design for Learning, inclusive education, higher education, student diversity, accessibility, medical model of disability, faculty teaching practices, autoethnography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review