Cited by 64Global Maternal and Child HealthPublic Health and NutritionMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

Assessment of Factors Associated with Adherence to Iron-Folic Acid Supplementation Among Urban and Rural Pregnant Women in North Western Zone of Tigray, Ethiopia: Comparative Study

Open access
Gebre, Abel·2015·International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences

Abstract

Introduction: Iron deficiency is the leading nutrient deficiency in the world affecting the lives of more than 2 billion people, accounting to over 30% of the world’s population. Pregnant women are particularly at high risk of iron deficiency. Objective: To determine and compare the adherence rate and identify factors associated with iron folic acid supplementation among urban and rural pregnant women attending antenatal clinics in North Western Zone of Tigray, Ethiopia. Methods: An institution based comparative cross sectional study was employed among 358 urban and 356 rural pregnant women attending antenatal clinics in North Western Zone of Tigray from March to April 2014. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with adherence to iron-folic acid supplementation among urban and rural pregnant women. All tests were two-sided and p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The rate of adherence to iron folic acid supplementation among the pregnant women in the urban and rural communities was 37.2% (95%CI, 32.26%-42.25%) and 28.9% (95%CI, 24.4%-33.81%) respectively indicating that there was no significant difference among the two groups with regard to adherence to iron-folic acid supplementation. The independent predictors for maternal adherence to iron folic acid supplementation were early registration (AOR= 1.778, 95% CI= 1.076– 2.936), having four or more visits (AOR=3.784, 95%CI=2.073-6.909), previous anemia (AOR=1.913, 95%CI=1.135-3.223), and current anemia (AOR= 0.408, 95%CI=0.224-0.744) for urban pregnant women. Similarly, elderly age (AOR=0.527, 95%CI=0.315-0.881), early registration (AOR=1.918, 95%CI=1.116-3.296), previous anemia (AOR= 2.472, 95%CI=1.352-4.517) and current anemia (AOR=0.400, 95%CI=0.214-0.749) were the independent predictors for maternal adherence to iron folic acid supplementation for the rural pregnant women. Conclusion: Adherence rate to iron-folic acid supplementation in both urban and rural communities were very low. Comprehensive nutrition education should focus on the importance of adherence to iron folic acid tablets both for urban and rural pregnant women.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.11648/j.ijnfs.20150402.16

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 19 · Cited by 64

Authors
Gebre, A.
Venue
International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences
Published
2015
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
161
ISSN
2327-2694 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W137470050
Cited by
64
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 4
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Public Health and Nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
iron and folic acid supplementation, medication adherence, pregnant women, urban-rural comparison, anemia in pregnancy, antenatal care visits, iron deficiency, Ethiopia, predictors of adherence, maternal health service utilization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review