Cited by 5Construction Project Management and PerformanceValue Engineering and ManagementBIM and Construction Integration

Risk Management Processes and Analysis in Projects Construction Industry

Open access
Leslie Appiah, Boateng·2020·Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering

Abstract

In the area of project construction industry, risk management has become an indispensable index of concern which needs to be focused on in order to ensure effective and successful execution of projects in the construction industry. This paper focuses on risk management within projects construction field and also to find out the opinions and ideas on the significance of the construction projects risks, and also to explore the risk analysis, risk response techniques and strategies as well as risk management processes and practices in construction industry. The questionnaire prepared for the survey was distributed both via e-mail and by sending questionnaire link onto a WhatsApp platform group of the respondents and 85 member respondents results were analyzed in the form of bar charts, column chart and radar chart. The survey results revealed that majority of the total respondents are in the capacity or position as Project Managers and also have over 15 years working experience, and as well attained Master’s degree qualification. It was also revealed that risk events are usually responsible for the poor delivery and quality of work, accompanied with delays and other associated losses in project construction and also risks that are associated with high probability and high impact are required to undergo further analysis, including quantification and thorough risk management. The most frequently used risk response technique according to the respondents is through the issuance of performance bonds, warranties and guarantees and also the most frequently used risk analysis practice is the Project Documented knowledge and Review Analysis. Risk management in project construction is therefore a constant learning process to constantly improve upon practices in order to adapt and increase the process efficiency of dealing with risk in construction projects as well as its successful execution.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.11648/j.jccee.20200504.14

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Risk management is carried out through five processes: plan risk, risk identification, qualitative risk analysis, quantitative risk analysis, plan risk response and control risk.

    “Risk management is carried out through five processes which are 1) plan risk, 2) risk identification, 3) qualitative risk analysis, 4) quantitative risk analysis, 5) plan risk response and control risk [4].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leslie Appiah, B.
Venue
Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering
Published
2020
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
92
ISSN
2637-3882 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3080163608
Cited by
5
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Journal of Civil Construction and Environmental Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Construction Project Management and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Value Engineering and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › BIM and Construction Integration
Keywords
construction risk management, risk analysis, risk management process, construction delays, performance bonds, risk quantification, project managers' perceptions, construction quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review