Macrophage Polarization in Response to Varying Pore Sizes of 3D Polyurethane Scaffolds
Abstract
Activated macrophages dominate the progression of foreign-body response (FBR) and may be in a bimodal state, which determines the fate of biomaterials postimplantation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the phenotypic profile of macrophages polarized by waterborne biodegradable polyurethane (WBPU) scaffolds with different pore diameters (PU8, PU12, and PU16) both in vitro and in vivo. The results demonstrated that WBPU scaffolds with smaller pore sizes promoted the polarization of RAW 264.7 cells towards an M1 phenotypic profile at the early stage (24 and 48 h of in vitro cultivation), indicating a pro-inflammatory response. After being implanted subcutaneously, however, the WBPU scaffolds recruited more macrophages over time and polarized them towards an M2 phenotype on Day 3 and 14, presenting an anti-inflammatory response and tissue repair. When the internal pores were filled up (on Day 30 of implantation), the interaction between the scaffolds and macrophages decreased, indicating an endpoint of tissue repair. In general, WBPU scaffolds with tunable internal pore sizes have potential application prospects in the field of tissue engineering.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Porosity and pore size represent other scaffold immunomodulatory features.
“Porosity and pore size represent other scaffold immunomodulatory features.”
From Resorbable Biomaterials Used for 3D Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering: A Review (2023) · cites this paper as [215]
Findings revealed that bigger pore size had a more pro-regenerative effect.
“Findings revealed that bigger pore size had a more pro-regenerative effect [214,215].”
From Resorbable Biomaterials Used for 3D Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering: A Review (2023) · cites this paper as [215]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Resorbable Biomaterials Used for 3D Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering: A Review
Vach Agocsova, S., Culenova, M., Birova, I., Omanikova, L., Moncmanova, B., Danisovic, L., Ziaran, S., Bakos, D., & Alexy, P. (2023) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma16124267 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
- Authors
- Liang, R., Fang, D., Lin, W., Wang, Y., Liu, Z., Wang, Y., Zeng, Y., He, M., Li, J., Luo, F., Li, J., Liu, H., Xu, J., & Tan, H.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Biomedical Nanotechnology
- Publisher
- American Scientific Publishers
- Published
- 2018-10-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1744-1760
- ISSN
- 1550-7033 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2884142145
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 0.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Biomedical Nanotechnology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
- Keywords
- macrophage polarization, 3D scaffolds, pore size, foreign body reaction, RAW 264.7 macrophages, subcutaneous implantation, tissue repair, biomaterial implantation
- MeSH terms
- RAW 264.7 Cells, Animals, Macrophages, Polyurethanes, Mice, Tissue Scaffolds
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review