Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 41Cloud Computing and Resource ManagementDistributed and Parallel Computing SystemsEnergy Efficiency in Computing

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

An Efficient Load Balancing Method by Using Machine Learning-Based VM Distribution and Dynamic Resource Mapping

Lilhore, Umesh Kumar, Simaiya, Sarita, Guleria, Kalpna, Prasad, Devendra·2020·Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience

Abstract

In cloud computing, balancing the load among VMs and resources is a major research area, which still needs attention. The primary aim of this research is to expand an effective cloud load balancing approach, enhance the reaction time, lessen the ready time, premiere utilization of sources as well lessen the activity rejection time. The proposed MLBL method is primarily based on the SVM and K suggest clustering method. In the proposed MLBL technique SVM classification method used to create activity businesses based totally at the size. Later K method clustering technique is used to create the institution of Virtual machines based totally on their usage of CPU and number one memory (RAM). We are providing an MLBL method based totally on system learning-based VM distribution and dynamic aid mapping. In cloud computing, VMs are scheduled to hosts as in keeping with their utilization (a host which has better availability of memory) without thinking about common utilizations. The proposed technique divides the assets into various organizations as well as VMs and then follow dynamic aid mapping. The proposed MLBL technique creates VMs clusters to execute comparable task agencies that enhance the QoS and ideal utilization of sources in addition to lessen the process rejection time.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1166/jctn.2020.8928

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Prassanna, 2016, Towards an Analysis of Load Balancing Algorithms to Enhance Efficient Management of Cloud Data Centres., pp.143, 10.1007/978-3-319-30348-2_13 · DOI
  2. Chen, 2017, CLB: A novel load balancing architecture and algorithm for cloud services., Computers & Electrical Engineering, 58, pp.154, 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2016.01.029 · DOI
  3. Al Nuaimi, 2012, A Survey of Load Balancing in Cloud Computing: Challenges and Algorithms., pp.137, 10.1109/NCCA.2012.29 · DOI
  4. Pawar, 2017, A hybrid ACHBDF load balancing method for optimum resource utilization in cloud computing., International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology (IJSRC-SEIT), 2, pp.367
  5. Ran, 2016, Agent-Based Bidirectional Bidding Mechanism for Efficient Scheduling of Real-Time Tasks in Cloud Computing., IEEE International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, and Optimization Techniques (ICEEOT), pp.104
  6. Lilhore, 2016, Advance anticipatory performance improvement model, for cloud computing., International Journal of Recent Trends in Engineering & Research (IJRTER), 2, pp.210
  7. Singh, 2015, Autonomous agent based load balancing algorithm in cloud computing., Procedia Computer Science, 45, pp.832, 10.1016/j.procs.2015.03.168 · DOI
  8. Mishra, 2017, Review of various data storage and retrieval method for cloud computing., International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology (IJSRCSEIT), 2, pp.584
  9. Calheiros, 2011, CloudSim: A toolkit for modeling and simulation of cloud computing environments and evaluation of resource provisioning algorithms., Software: Practice and Experience, 41, pp.23
  10. Lilhore, 2016, A novel performance improvement model for cloud computing., International Journal of Science & Engineering Development Research (IJSDR), 1, pp.410
  11. Lilhore, 2016, Modified fuzzy logic and advanced particle swarm optimization model for cloud computing., International Journal of Modern Trends in Engineering and Research (IJMTER), 3, pp.230
  12. Desai, 2013, A survey of various load balancing techniques and challenges in cloud computing., International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 2, pp.158
  13. Nishant, 2012, Load Balancing of Nodes in Cloud Using Ant Colony Optimization., pp.3, 10.1109/UKSim.2012.11 · DOI
  14. ALGhafran, 2015, An efficient load balancing clustering algorithm for mobile ad hoc networks., International Journal of Computing, Communications & Instrumentation Engg. (UCCIE), 2, pp.215
  15. Kapoor, 2015, Cluster Based Load Balancing in Cloud Computing., pp.76, 10.1109/IC3.2015.7346656 · DOI
  16. Panwar, 2015, Load Balancing in Cloud Computing Using Dynamic Load Management Algorithm., pp.773, 10.1109/ICGCIoT.2015.7380567 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Lilhore, U. K., Simaiya, S., Guleria, K., & Prasad, D.
Affiliations
Chitkara University (IN)
Venue
Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience
Published
2020-06-01
Volume
17
Issue
6
Pages
2545-2551
ISSN
1546-1955 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3094494221
Cited by
41
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 4
FWCI
6.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Computing and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Energy Efficiency in Computing
Keywords
cloud load balancing, support vector machine, K-means clustering, resource utilization, quality of service

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review