The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparative Cytotoxicity of Al2O3, CeO2, TiO2 and ZnO Nanoparticles to Human Lung Cells
Abstract
The increased applications of nanoparticles in a wide range of industrial fields raise the concern about their potential toxicity to human. The aim of this study was to assess and compare the toxicity of four different oxide nanoparticles (Al2O3, CeO2, TiO2 and ZnO) to human lung epithelial cells, A549 carcinoma cells and L-132 normal cells, in vitro. We focused on the toxicological effects of the present nanoparticles on cell proliferation, cell viability, membrane integrity and oxidative stress. The long-term cytotoxicity of nanoparticles was also evaluated by employing the clonogenic assay. Among four nanoparticles tested, ZnO exhibited the highest cytotoxicity in terms of cell proliferation, cell viability, membrane integrity and colony formation in both cell lines. Al2O3, CeO2 and TiO2 showed little adverse effects on cell proliferation and cell viability. However, TiO2 induced oxidative stress in a concentration- and time-dependent manner. CeO2 caused membrane damage and inhibited colony formation in long-term, but with different degree depending on cell lines. Al2O3 seems to be less toxic than the other nanoparticles even after long time exposure. These results highlight the need for caution during manufacturing process of nanomaterials as well as further investigation on the toxicity mechanism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mechanisms of Nanoparticle-Induced Oxidative Stress and Toxicity
Manke, A., Wang, L., & Rojanasakul, Y. (2013) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2013/942916 · Cited by 1,727
Toxicity assessment of nanomaterials: methods and challenges
Dhawan, A., & Sharma, V. (2010) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-010-3996-x · Cited by 466
Environmental Geochemistry of Cerium: Applications and Toxicology of Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles
Dahle, J., & Arai, Y. (2015) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph120201253 · Cited by 396
Huang, Y., Liang, Y., Rao, Y., Zhu, D., Cao, J.-J., Shen, Z., Ho, W., & Lee, S. C. (2017) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b04460 · Cited by 313
Toxicology of Nanomaterials Used in Nanomedicine
Zhao, J., & Castranova, V. (2011) · Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B · doi:10.1080/10937404.2011.615113 · Cited by 280
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, I.-S., Baek, M., & Choi, S.-J.
- Venue
- Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology
- Publisher
- American Scientific Publishers
- Published
- 2010-05-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 3453-3458
- ISSN
- 1533-4880 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2072009655
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative Cytotoxicity of Al2O3, CeO2, TiO2 and ZnO Nanoparticles to Human Lung Cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1166/jnn.2010.2340
- The paper
- Kim, I.-S., Baek, M., & Choi, S.-J. (2010). Comparative Cytotoxicity of Al2O3, CeO2, TiO2 and ZnO Nanoparticles to Human Lung Cells. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2010.2340
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.