Interaction between value and perceptual salience in value-driven attentional capture
Open accessAbstract
Previous research demonstrated that associating a stimulus with value (e.g., monetary reward) can increase its salience and induce a value-driven attentional capture when it becomes a distractor in visual search. Here we investigate to what extent this value-driven attentional capture is affected by the perceptual salience of the stimulus and the type of value attached to the stimulus. We showed that a color previously associated with monetary gain or loss impaired subsequent search for a unique shape target (Experiment 1), but a shape that was previously associated with gain or loss did not affect search for a unique color target (Experiments 2A and 2B), indicating that the associative learning of value and the effect of value-driven attentional capture are modulated by the perceptual salience of a stimulus. The value-based attentional capture recurred when the shape distractor was paired more strongly with monetary loss (Experiment 2C) or was paired with pain stimulation (Experiment 3), indicating that when the value is significant enough to an organism, it can render a perceptually less salient stimulus capable of capturing attention in visual search. These results suggest that value interacts with perceptual salience to modulate the value-based attentional capture, and the extent of value information capturing attention depends on the biological significance of the value attribute.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fear-associated stimuli strongly bias spatial attention.
“Corroborating evidence comes from fear-conditioning studies which show that fear-associated stimuli strongly bias spatial attention (Mulckhuyse & Dalmaijer, 2016; Wang, Yu, & Zhou, 2013).”
From Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention. (2018) · cites this paper as Wang, Yu, & Zhou, 2013
Reward is interrelated with the physical salience of a stimulus.
“reward is interrelated with the physical salience of a stimulus (e.g., Wang et al., 2013)”
From Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention. (2018) · cites this paper as Wang et al., 2013
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 106
- Authors
- Wang, L., Yu, H., & Zhou, X.
- Affiliations
- Peking University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, L.
- Yu, H.
- Zhou, X.
- Venue
- Journal of Vision
- Published
- 2013-03-11
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 5-5
- ISSN
- 1534-7362 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2121525263
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 6.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Vision (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Keywords
- perceptual salience, visual search, monetary rewards, financial losses, pain, associative learning, distractor effects, attentional capture
- MeSH terms
- Attention, Color Perception, Cues, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Reward, Serial Learning, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review