The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Slant from texture and disparity cues: Optimal cue combination
Open accessAbstract
How does the visual system combine information from different depth cues to estimate three-dimensional scene parameters? We tested a maximum-likelihood estimation (MLE) model of cue combination for perspective (texture) and binocular disparity cues to surface slant. By factoring the reliability of each cue into the combination process, MLE provides more reliable estimates of slant than would be available from either cue alone. We measured the reliability of each cue in isolation across a range of slants and distances using a slant-discrimination task. The reliability of the texture cue increases as |slant| increases and does not change with distance. The reliability of the disparity cue decreases as distance increases and varies with slant in a way that also depends on viewing distance. The trends in the single-cue data can be understood in terms of the information available in the retinal images and issues related to solving the binocular correspondence problem. To test the MLE model, we measured perceived slant of two-cue stimuli when disparity and texture were in conflict and the reliability of slant estimation when both cues were available. Results from the two-cue study indicate, consistent with the MLE model, that observers weight each cue according to its relative reliability: Disparity weight decreased as distance and |slant| increased. We also observed the expected improvement in slant estimation when both cues were available. With few discrepancies, our data indicate that observers combine cues in a statistically optimal fashion and thereby reduce the variance of slant estimates below that which could be achieved from either cue alone. These results are consistent with other studies that quantitatively examined the MLE model of cue combination. Thus, there is a growing empirical consensus that MLE provides a good quantitative account of cue combination and that sensory information is used in a manner that maximizes the precision of perceptual estimates.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Adults integrate texture and disparity cues to reduce the uncertainty of their estimates of slant, adjusting their relative weightings as they change in reliability (3).”
From Fusion of visual cues is not mandatory in children (2010) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“Human adults can reduce sensory uncertainty by integrating estimates, both across modalities (1, 2) (e.g., integrating vision and touch to judge size) and within a modality (3) (e.g., integrating visual stereoscopic and texture information to judge surface slant).”
From Fusion of visual cues is not mandatory in children (2010) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“Our assumptions and approach are based on previous more detailed validation of similar stimuli (3).”
From Fusion of visual cues is not mandatory in children (2010) · cites this paper as [3]
Citations
Cites
(1966) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,293
Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion
Ernst, M. O., & Banks, M. S. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415429a · Cited by 4,844
Self-citationComputational Geometry: Algorithms and Applications
de Berg, M., Cheong, O., van Kreveld, M. J., & Overmars, M. H. (1997) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 4,450
Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning
Körding, K. P., & Wolpert, D. M. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02169 · Cited by 2,004
The Ventriloquist Effect Results from Near-Optimal Bimodal Integration
Alais, D., & Burr, D. (2004) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2004.01.029 · Cited by 1,936
Object perception as Bayesian inference
Kersten, D., Mamassian, P., & Yuille, A. (2004) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142005 · Cited by 1,269
Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion
Landy, M. S., Maloney, L. T., Johnston, E. B., & Young, M. (1995) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(94)00176-m · Cited by 996
Self-citationGoodwin, C. (1995) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/030631295025002002 · Cited by 620
When Feeling Is More Important Than Seeing in Sensorimotor Adaptation
van Beers, R. J., Wolpert, D. M., & Haggard, P. (2002) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(02)00836-9 · Cited by 560
Researches in Binocular Vision
(1951) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1951.02920280080027 · Cited by 537
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 422
Stereo slant discrimination of planar 3D surfaces: Frontoparallel versus planar matching
Oluk, C., Bonnen, K., Burge, J., Cormack, L. K., & Geisler, W. S. (2022) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/jov.22.5.6 · Cited by 5
Probability as an Alternative to Logic for Rational Sensory–Motor Reasoning and Decision
Bessìère, P. (2008) · Springer tracts in advanced robotics · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-79007-5_1 · Cited by 5
Real-world interattribute distances lead to inefficient face gender categorization.
Dupuis-Roy, N., Fiset, D., Dufresne, K., Caplette, L., & Gosselin, F. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/a0037066 · Cited by 5
In visual search, guidance by surface type is different than classic guidance
Wolfe, J. M., Reijnen, E., Wert, M. J. V., & Kuzmova, Y. I. (2009) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2009.02.007 · Cited by 5
Liu, S., Kostrna, J. R., Sáenz‐Moncaleano, C., Ward, S. K., Paulsen, C., Klein, T., Gutierrez, O., & Tenenbaum, G. (2017) · European Journal of Sport Science · doi:10.1080/17461391.2017.1301561 · Cited by 5
Orientation-specific learning of the prior assumption for 3D slant perception
Taya, S., & Sato, M. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-29361-2 · Cited by 5
On Inter- and Intrahemispheric Differences in Visuospatial Perception
van der Ham, I. J. M., & Ruotolo, F. (2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-801638-1.00002-1 · Cited by 6
Wijntjes, M., & Pont, S. C. (2010) · ACM Transactions on Applied Perception · doi:10.1145/1823738.1823742 · Cited by 5
Temporal integration limits of stereovision in reaching and grasping
Wilson, K., Pearson, P. M., Matheson, H. E., & Marotta, J. J. (2008) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-008-1407-8 · Cited by 5
Integration of Sensory Information Within Touch and Across Modalities
Ernst, M. O., Bresciani, J., Drewing, K., & Bülthoff, H. (2004) · Cited by 5
3D Media and the Human Visual System
Watt, S. J., & MacKenzie, K. J. (2013) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118583593.ch18 · Cited by 6
Self-citationLew, W. H., & Coates, D. R. (2024) · Virtual Reality · doi:10.1007/s10055-024-01000-4 · Cited by 4
The contributions of pictorial, motion, and binocular cues to the perception of depth and distance
Hibbard, P. B., Asher, J. M., & Hornsey, R. L. (2025) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2025.108653 · Cited by 4
Illusory occlusion affects stereoscopic depth perception
Chen, Z., Denison, R. N., Whitney, D. C., & Maus, G. W. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-23548-3 · Cited by 4
A Leap of Faith: Revisiting Paradata in 3D Scholarship
Papadopoulos, C. (2024) · Knowledge management and organizational learning · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-53946-6_4 · Cited by 4
Amputees but not healthy subjects optimally integrate non-spatially matched visuo-tactile stimuli
Aurucci, G. V., Preatoni, G., Risso, G., & Raspopović, S. (2024) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2024.111685 · Cited by 4
The venetian-blind effect: a preference for zero disparity or zero slant?
Vlaskamp, B. N. S., Guan, P., & Banks, M. S. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00836 · Cited by 4
Self-citationPersistent grasping errors produce depth cue reweighting in perception
Cesanek, E., Taylor, J. A., & Fulvio Domini, A. (2020) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2020.09.007 · Cited by 4
The experience of stereoblindness does not improve use of texture for slant perception
Yang, P., Saunders, J. A., & Chen, Z. (2022) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/jov.22.5.3 · Cited by 4
Perceptual Adaptation to Continuous Versus Intermittent Exposure to Spatial Distortions
McLean, I. R., Manning, T. S., & Cooper, E. A. (2022) · Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.63.5.29 · Cited by 4
Conductance-based dendrites perform Bayes-optimal cue integration
Jordan, J., Sacramento, J., Wybo, W. A. M., Petrovici, M. A., & Senn, W. (2024) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012047 · Cited by 7
Shape constancy measured by a canonical-shape method
Howard, I. P., Fujii, Y., Allison, R. S., & Kirollos, R. (2013) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2013.10.021 · Cited by 4
A Non-Modular Approach to Visual Space Perception
Sedgwick, H. A., & Gillam, B. (2017) · Ecological Psychology · doi:10.1080/10407413.2017.1297189 · Cited by 4
Koh, K., Kwon, H. J., Kiemel, T., Miller, R. H., Park, Y. S., Kim, M. J., Kwon, Y. H., Kim, Y. H., & Shim, J. K. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-31792-w · Cited by 4
Depth cue reweighting requires altered correlations with haptic feedback
Cesanek, E., & Fulvio Domini, A. (2019) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/19.14.3 · Cited by 4
Three-Dimensional Shape: Cortical Mechanisms of Shape Extraction
Orban, G. A. (2008) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012370880-9.00321-2 · Cited by 4
Continuous Evolution of Statistical Estimators for Optimal Decision-Making
Saunders, I., & Vijayakumar, S. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0037547 · Cited by 4
The effect of pictorial depth information on projected size judgments
Farran, E. K., Whitaker, A., & Patel, N. (2009) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/app.71.1.207 · Cited by 4
Figure-Ground Separation by Cue Integration
Tang, X., & von der Malsburg, C. (2008) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.2008.03-06-176 · Cited by 4
Speaker-Sex Discrimination for Voiced and Whispered Vowels at Short Durations
Smith, D. R. R. (2016) · i-Perception · doi:10.1177/2041669516671320 · Cited by 4
Computational principles of adaptive multisensory combination in the Drosophila larvaPreprint
Wong, P. H., Braun, A., Malagarriga, D., Moehlis, J., Moreno‐Bote, R., Pouget, A., & Louis, M. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.05.04.539474 · Cited by 3
Martin, J., & Jogan, M. (2025) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.241170 · Cited by 3
Kuang, S., Shi, J., Wang, Y., & Zhang, T. (2017) · PsyCh Journal · doi:10.1002/pchj.165 · Cited by 3
Image statistics determine the integration of visual cues to motion-in-depth
Goutcher, R., Murray, L., & Benz, B. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-12051-5 · Cited by 3
Shape judgments in natural scenes: Convexity biases versus stereopsis
Hartle, B., Sudhama, A., Irving, E. L., Allison, R. S., Glaholt, M. G., & Wilcox, L. M. (2022) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/jov.22.8.6 · Cited by 3
Internal biases are linked to disrupted cue combination in children and adults
Negen, J., Slater, H., Bird, L., & Marko Nardini, A. (2022) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/jov.22.12.14 · Cited by 3
The precision of signals encoding active self-movement
Haynes, J. D., Gallagher, M., Culling, J. F., & Freeman, T. C. A. (2024) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00370.2023 · Cited by 3
Cue Combination of Conflicting Color and Luminance Edges
Sharman, R. J., McGraw, P. V., & Peirce, J. W. (2015) · i-Perception · doi:10.1177/2041669515621215 · Cited by 3
Gepshtein, S. (2009) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515080802703695 · Cited by 3
Cues and Pseudocues in Texture and Shape Perception
Landy, M. S., Ho, Y.-X., Serwe, S., Trommershäuser, J., & Maloney, L. T. (2011) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195387247.003.0014 · Cited by 3
Self-citationDynamic Cue Combination in Distributional Population Code Networks
Natarajan, R. D., & Zemel, R. S. (2011) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195387247.003.0020 · Cited by 3
Do humans drive spinal cord with limb velocity signal?
Galbreath, K. M. (2015) · The Research Repository @ WVU (West Virginia University) · doi:10.33915/etd.5639 · Cited by 3
A Bayesian model of distance perception from ocular convergence
Scarfe, P., & Hibbard, P. B. (2025) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013506 · Cited by 2
A Resource-Rational Account of Human Eye Movements During Immersive Visual Search
Radulescu, A., van Opheusden, B., Callaway, F., Griffiths, T. L., & Hillis, J. M. (2026) · Open Mind · doi:10.1162/opmi.a.322 · Cited by 2
Self-citationAston, S., Pattie, C., Graham, R. E., Slater, H., Beierholm, U., & Marko Nardini, A. (2022) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/jov.22.13.8 · Cited by 2
Human sensory adaptation to the ecological structure of environmental statistics
Neri, P. (2024) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/jov.24.3.3 · Cited by 2
Optimal Estimation of Local Motion-in-Depth with Naturalistic Stimuli
Herrera, D., & Burge, J. (2024) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0490-24.2024 · Cited by 3
Bolhasani, E., Aboutalebi, S. H., & Merrikhi, Y. (2025) · Advanced Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1002/aisy.202500147 · Cited by 4
Humans optimally integrate cutaneous and proprioceptive cues in haptic size perception
Allen, K. S., & Goldreich, D. (2026) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2025.1653390 · Cited by 2
What do we perceive from motion pictures? A computational account
Cheong, L., & Xiang, X. (2007) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.24.001485 · Cited by 2
Diard, J., Bessìère, P., & Berthoz, A. (2013) · Spatial Cognition and Computation · doi:10.1080/13875868.2012.756490 · Cited by 3
Optimal integration of visual speed across different spatiotemporal frequency channels
Jogan, M., & Stocker, A. A. (2013) · neural information processing systems · Cited by 2
◾ Contour-, Surface-, and Object-Related Coding in the Visual Cortex
von der Heydt, R. (2011) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/b10518-11 · Cited by 2
Krause, L.-M., & Herbort, O. (2023) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.104062 · Cited by 2
Sensorimotor adaptation compensates for distortions of 3D shape information
Cesanek, E. (2019) · Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) · doi:10.17632/tj9p6mx8gf · Cited by 2
Chinellato, E., & del Pobil, A. P. (2007) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-73055-2_42 · Cited by 2
Bayesian Analysis of Perceived Eye Level
Orendorff, E., Kalesinskas, L., Palumbo, R. T., & Albert, M. V. (2016) · Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncom.2016.00135 · Cited by 1
Optimal combination of illusory and luminance-defined 3-D surfaces: A role for ambiguity
Hartle, B., Wilcox, L. M., & Murray, R. F. (2018) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/18.4.14 · Cited by 1
March, J. G., Krishnan, A., Mantiuk, R., & Watt, S. J. (2024) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/jov.24.2.13 · Cited by 1
Self-citationEffects of the amount of monocular shape information on stereo scaling problem
Shigemasu, H., & Satô, T. (2012) · Japanese Psychological Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-5884.2011.00509.x · Cited by 1
Binocular Vision and Depth Perception
Patterson, R. (2015) · Handbook of Visual Display Technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-35947-7_9-2 · Cited by 1
Perception of 3D Slant Out of the Box
van der Kooij, K., & Pas, S. F. T. (2011) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00119 · Cited by 1
Quality, quantity and precision of depth perception in stereoscopic displays
Haines, A. E., Hornsey, R. L., & Hibbard, P. B. (2015) · International Conference on D Imaging · doi:10.1109/ic3d.2015.7391813 · Cited by 1
Computational modeling of human multisensory spatial representation by a neural architecture
Domenici, N., Sanguineti, V., Morerio, P., Campus, C., Bue, A. D., Gori, M., & Murino, V. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0280987 · Cited by 1
Scheller, M., Aston, S., Chazelle, T., Allen, C., Slater, H., & Marko Nardini, A. (2026) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2026.115526 · Cited by 1
Spatial-Temporal Characteristics of Multisensory Integration
Sim, S. H. (2017) · Cited by 1
The concept of (depth) cues: An exemplification of homuncular language in vision science
Pagel, R. (2018) · Theory & Psychology · doi:10.1177/0959354318810184 · Cited by 1
On the Aperture Problem of Binocular 3D Motion Perception
Lages, M., & Heron, S. (2019) · Vision · doi:10.3390/vision3040064 · Cited by 1
Bayesian Multisensory Perception
Hospedales, T. M. (2008) · ERA · Cited by 1
8.1: Invited Paper : Achieving Near‐Correct Focus Cues in a 3D Display using Multiple Image Planes
Banks, M. S. (2006) · SID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers · doi:10.1889/1.2433629 · Cited by 1
Self-citationAudiovisual spatial congruence, and applications to 3D sound and stereoscopic video
André, C. (2014) · ORBi (University of Liège) · Cited by 1
Bayesian perceptual inference in linear Gaussian models
Battaglia, P. (2010) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 1
Garcia, C. D., Liu, S., Laurens, J., DeAngelis, G. C., Dickman, J. D., & Angelaki, D. E. (2018) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/343764 · Cited by 1
Su, G., Lai, Y., Kwasinski, A., & Wang, H. (2012) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118358023.ch7 · Cited by 1
Optimal motion-in-depth estimation with natural stimuliPreprint
Herrera, D., & Burge, J. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.03.14.585059 · Cited by 1
Multisensory integration across reference frames with additive feed-forward networksPreprint
Farahmandi, A., Khoozani, P. A., & Blohm, G. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.11.25.625309 · Cited by 1
Within- and Cross-Modal Distance Information Disambiguate Visual Size-Change Perception
Battaglia, P., Luca, M. D., Ernst, M. O., Schrater, P., Machulla, T., & Kersten, D. (2010) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000697 · Cited by 34
Effect of absence on visual perception and discomfort
Zou, B., Liu, Y., Wang, Y., Huang, T., & Zhu, Q. (2013) · Multidimensional Signal Processing Workshop · doi:10.1109/ivmspw.2013.6611915
Cue combination of colour and luminance in edge detection
Sharman, R. J. (2014) · Nottingham ePrints (University of Nottingham)
Wolpert, D. M., Dingwell, J. B., Smallwood, R. F., Cusumano, J. P., Sohn, H., Lee, S., O’Brien, M. K., & Ahmed, A. A. (2014)
Visual-Haptic Presence Systems: Utility Optimization, Compliance Perception, and Data Compression
Kuschel, M. (2009) · mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich)
Modèles probabilistes formels pour problèmes cognitifs usuels
Bessìère, P., Diard, J., & Colas, F. (2016) · Intellectica Revue de l Association pour la Recherche Cognitive · doi:10.3406/intel.2016.1792 · Cited by 1
Visual Illusion and its Application to Image Media Technology
Takeuchi, T., & Yoshimoto, S. (2014) · The Journal of The Institute of Image Information and Television Engineers · doi:10.3169/itej.68.855
Neural Representation, Learning and Manipulation of Uncertainty
Natarajan, R. D. (2010) · TSpace (University of Toronto)
Stereoscopic surface interpolation from illusory contours
Hartle, B., Murray, R. F., & Wilcox, L. M. (2016) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/16.12.1330
The role of posterior parietal cortex in multisensory decision-making
Raposo, D. C. (2016) · Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT)
Stereopsis in the Presence of Binocular Disparity
Linton, P. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-66293-0_2
Schauen Sie, was Sie hören – Wie das Gehirn mit allen seinen Sinnen die Welt wahrnimmt
Noppeney, U., Jones, S. A., Rohe, T., & Ferrari, A. (2018) · e-Neuroforum · doi:10.1515/nf-2017-0066
Spatial sampling in ensemble perception of hue
Virtanen, L. S., Olkkonen, M., & Saarela, T. (2019) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/19.10.195
Exploring how object shape and binocular vision interact to make or break camouflage
Cammack, P. (2017) · St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository)
Action, time, and uncertainty: two types of temporal uncertainty in cognitive motor control
Schüür, F. (2012) · UCL Discovery (University College London)
Examen du silo de maïs en pratique
Vagneur, M., & Bertheloz, B. (2008) · Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)
Liang, P., Wu, S., & Gu, F. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-7393-5_4
McLean, I. R., Erkelens, I. M., & Cooper, E. A. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2400086121 · Cited by 1
Target Selection with Avatars in Mixed Reality
DeMarbre, E., & Teather, R. J. (2024) · IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW) · doi:10.1109/vrw62533.2024.00408
Metadata
- Authors
- Hillis, J. M., Watt, S. J., Landy, M. S., & Banks, M. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Bangor University (GB)
- New York University (US)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Vision
- Published
- 2004-12-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1
- ISSN
- 1534-7362 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2158527951
- Cited by
- 421
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 28
- FWCI
- 7.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Vision (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Eye Institute (R01EY012851, EY 08266, EY12851, R01EY008266)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Keywords
- surface slant perception, cue combination, binocular disparity, maximum likelihood estimation, cue reliability, perceptual precision, depth perception
- MeSH terms
- Cues, Depth Perception, Form Perception, Humans, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Vision, Binocular, Vision Disparity, Likelihood Functions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review