The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Grouping of contextual elements that affect vernier thresholds
Open accessAbstract
To reveal the mechanisms of spatial interference in the fovea, we examined the capacity of a variety of lateral flanking configurations to interfere with alignment thresholds of a vertical vernier. A single line on each side of the vernier, at the optimal separation of 2-3 arcmin, raises thresholds threefold or more and masks most effectively when its length equals that of the vernier. For an array of equal lines whose length differs from that of the vernier, masking is reduced but not when vernier and flanks have the same length. The reduction for shorter and longer flanks can be reversed by inserting a gap in the row of flanks. By comparing the masking effect of arrays of mixed line lengths, we show that when a pair of flanks, which by itself masks strongly, becomes a component of a coherent contextual configuration, it loses much of its effectiveness to interact. Observers' ranking of the conspicuity of the vernier test pattern among the flanking elements is negatively correlated with the threshold elevation. We conclude that clustering of contextual patterns influences their capacity to mask. Discrimination of a target deteriorates when the target is grouped within an array of surrounding elements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PEST: Efficient Estimates on Probability Functions
Taylor, M. M., & Creelman, C. D. (1967) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1910407 · Cited by 1,173
Angelucci (2002) · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.08.030185.002203 · Cited by 1,170
Cited by
Visual crowding: a fundamental limit on conscious perception and object recognition
Whitney, D., & Levi, D. M. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.02.005 · Cited by 849
The function of consciousness in multisensory integration
Palmer, T. D., & Ramsey, A. K. (2012) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.08.003 · Cited by 91
Training improves visual processing speed and generalizes to untrained functions
Lev, M., Ludwig, K., Gilaie-Dotan, S., Voss, S., Sterzer, P., Hesselmann, G., & Polat, U. (2014) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep07251 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Malania, M., Herzog, M. H., & Westheimer, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Vision
- Published
- 2007-01-29
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1
- ISSN
- 1534-7362 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2054211341
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Grouping of contextual elements that affect vernier thresholds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1167/7.2.1
- The paper
- Malania, M., Herzog, M. H., & Westheimer, G. (2007). Grouping of contextual elements that affect vernier thresholds. Journal of Vision. https://doi.org/10.1167/7.2.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.