The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Time course and robustness of ERP object and face differences
Open accessAbstract
Conflicting results have been reported about the earliest "true" ERP differences related to face processing, with the bulk of the literature focusing on the signal in the first 200 ms after stimulus onset. Part of the discrepancy might be explained by uncontrolled low-level differences between images used to assess the timing of face processing. In the present experiment, we used a set of faces, houses, and noise textures with identical amplitude spectra to equate energy in each spatial frequency band. The timing of face processing was evaluated using face-house and face-noise contrasts, as well as upright-inverted stimulus contrasts. ERP differences were evaluated systematically at all electrodes, across subjects, and in each subject individually, using trimmed means and bootstrap tests. Different strategies were employed to assess the robustness of ERP differential activities in individual subjects and group comparisons. We report results showing that the most conspicuous and reliable effects were systematically observed in the N170 latency range, starting at about 130-150 ms after stimulus onset.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009 · Cited by 24,371
Allison, T. (1999) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/9.5.415 · Cited by 882
Puce, A. (1999) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/9.5.445 · Cited by 422
Cited by
Controlling low-level image properties: The SHINE toolbox
Willenbockel, V., Sadr, J., Fiset, D., Horne, G. O., Gosselin, F., & Tanaka, J. W. (2010) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/brm.42.3.671 · Cited by 1,166
Understanding face perception by means of human electrophysiology
Rossion, B. (2014) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2014.02.013 · Cited by 314
Metadata
- Authors
- Rousselet, G. A., Husk, J. S., Bennett, P. J., & Sekuler, A. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Vision
- Published
- 2008-09-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3-3
- ISSN
- 1534-7362 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2055084839
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Time course and robustness of ERP object and face differences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1167/8.12.3
- The paper
- Rousselet, G. A., Husk, J. S., Bennett, P. J., & Sekuler, A. B. (2008). Time course and robustness of ERP object and face differences. Journal of Vision. https://doi.org/10.1167/8.12.3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
