Cited by 53Visual perception and processing mechanismsNeural dynamics and brain functionMultisensory perception and integration

No evidence for widespread synchronized networks in binocular rivalry: MEG frequency tagging entrains primarily early visual cortex

Open access
Kamphuisen, Allard, Bauer, Markus, van Ee, Raymond·2008·Journal of Vision

Abstract

We investigated the spatio-temporal dynamics of the steady-state-visual-evoked field during perceptual switches in binocular rivalry using MEG. Several authors have previously used frequency tagging in MEG studies on binocular rivalry and have claimed to have found a widespread network of synchronized areas that are entrained by the stimulus, reaching up to frontal regions. Moreover, it has been claimed that the results prove that becoming aware of a stimulus is established by increased intra- and interhemispheric synchronization of brain areas, separated by large distances. Our results dovetailed nicely with previous findings such as power and coherence modulations as a function of perceptual state. However, while we also found stimulus-entrained activity across the entire scalp, a phase analysis revealed that the spatially extended nature of the frequency tag was produced by a limited set of occipital sources. Furthermore, we provide evidence that the coherence results from earlier studies are ambiguous in that they likely measured coherence between different sensors whose signals were dominated by the same sources. We conclude that the claims about widespread synchronized networks to consciously perceive flicker stimuli are currently unconvincing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1167/8.5.4

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lesion studies suggest that consciousness persists after widespread frontal lesions, and recent work controlling for confounding factors has cast doubt on a central role of the fronto-parietal network in supporting consciousness.

    “However, lesion studies suggest that consciousness persists after widespread frontal lesions 23,48 and recent work controlling for confounding factors related to stimulus processing, attention, and task performance have cast doubt on a central role of this fronto-parietal network in supporting consciousness 23,49,50 .”

    From The neural correlates of dreaming (2017) · cites this paper as [50]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kamphuisen, A., Bauer, M., & van Ee, R.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Max Planck Institute for Human Development (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Kamphuisen, Allard
  • Bauer, Markus
Venue
Journal of Vision
Published
2008-05-01
Volume
8
Issue
5
Pages
4
ISSN
1534-7362 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2097961721
Cited by
53
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Vision (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
Keywords
binocular rivalry, frequency tagging, perceptual switching, neural entrainment, interhemispheric synchronization, early visual cortex, conscious perception, flicker perception
MeSH terms
Awareness, Brain Mapping, Cortical Synchronization, Flicker Fusion, Humans, Functional Laterality, Photic Stimulation, Visual Cortex, Magnetoencephalography, Vision, Binocular, Vision Disparity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review