No evidence for widespread synchronized networks in binocular rivalry: MEG frequency tagging entrains primarily early visual cortex
Open accessAbstract
We investigated the spatio-temporal dynamics of the steady-state-visual-evoked field during perceptual switches in binocular rivalry using MEG. Several authors have previously used frequency tagging in MEG studies on binocular rivalry and have claimed to have found a widespread network of synchronized areas that are entrained by the stimulus, reaching up to frontal regions. Moreover, it has been claimed that the results prove that becoming aware of a stimulus is established by increased intra- and interhemispheric synchronization of brain areas, separated by large distances. Our results dovetailed nicely with previous findings such as power and coherence modulations as a function of perceptual state. However, while we also found stimulus-entrained activity across the entire scalp, a phase analysis revealed that the spatially extended nature of the frequency tag was produced by a limited set of occipital sources. Furthermore, we provide evidence that the coherence results from earlier studies are ambiguous in that they likely measured coherence between different sensors whose signals were dominated by the same sources. We conclude that the claims about widespread synchronized networks to consciously perceive flicker stimuli are currently unconvincing.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Lesion studies suggest that consciousness persists after widespread frontal lesions, and recent work controlling for confounding factors has cast doubt on a central role of the fronto-parietal network in supporting consciousness.
“However, lesion studies suggest that consciousness persists after widespread frontal lesions 23,48 and recent work controlling for confounding factors related to stimulus processing, attention, and task performance have cast doubt on a central role of this fronto-parietal network in supporting consciousness 23,49,50 .”
From The neural correlates of dreaming (2017) · cites this paper as [50]
Cites
Meng, M., & Tong, F. (2004) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/4.7.2 · Cited by 417 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The neural correlates of dreaming
Siclari, F., Baird, B., Perogamvros, L., Bernardi, G., LaRocque, J. J., Riedner, B., Boly, M., Postle, B. R., & Tononi, G. (2017) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4545 · Cited by 712 · see citing works
Binocular rivalry: frontal activity relates to introspection and action but not to perception
Frässle, S., Sommer, J., Jansen, A., Naber, M., & Einhäuser, W. (2014) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4403-13.2014 · Cited by 409 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kamphuisen, A., Bauer, M., & van Ee, R.
- Affiliations
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Max Planck Institute for Human Development (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Kamphuisen, Allard
- Bauer, Markus
- ORCID
- Bauer, Markus
- Venue
- Journal of Vision
- Published
- 2008-05-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 4
- ISSN
- 1534-7362 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2097961721
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Vision (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Keywords
- binocular rivalry, frequency tagging, perceptual switching, neural entrainment, interhemispheric synchronization, early visual cortex, conscious perception, flicker perception
- MeSH terms
- Awareness, Brain Mapping, Cortical Synchronization, Flicker Fusion, Humans, Functional Laterality, Photic Stimulation, Visual Cortex, Magnetoencephalography, Vision, Binocular, Vision Disparity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review