The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Supplemental Oxygen Improves Diabetic Macular Edema: A Pilot Study
Abstract
PURPOSE: Diabetic macular edema (DME) is the most common cause of moderate visual disability in persons of working age in the United States. The pathogenesis of DME is poorly understood. In this study, the effect of retinal hypoxia in the development and maintenance of DME was investigated. METHODS: Five patients with chronic DME despite at least one focal laser photocoagulation treatment (nine eyes) received 4 L/min of inspired oxygen by nasal cannula for 3 months. Best corrected visual acuity (VA) and retinal thickness, assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT), were measured at baseline, during 3 months of oxygen treatment, and for 3 months after stopping oxygen. RESULTS: After 3 months of oxygen therapy, nine of nine eyes with DME at baseline showed a reduction in thickness of the center of the macula. Foveal thickness (FTH) above the normal range was reduced by an average of 43.5% (range, 14%-100%), excess foveolar thickness (CEN) was reduced by an average of 42.1% (range, 13%-100%), and excess macular volume was reduced by an average of 54% (range, 35%-100%). Statistical analyses suggested that these changes were unlikely to be due to chance (P = 0.0077 by Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Three eyes showed improvement in VA by at least 2 lines, one by slightly less than 2 lines, and five eyes showed no change. Three months after discontinuation of oxygen, five of the nine eyes showed increased thickening of the macula compared with when oxygen was discontinued. CONCLUSIONS: Supplemental inspired oxygen may decrease macular thickness due to DME, suggesting that retinal hypoxia is involved in the development and maintenance of DME.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Retinal angiogenesis in development and disease
Gariano, R. F., & Gardner, T. W. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04482 · Cited by 705
Diabetic Macular Edema: Pathogenesis and Treatment
Bhagat, N., Grigorian, R. A., Tutela, A., & Zarbin, M. A. (2009) · Survey of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2008.10.001 · Cited by 571
Two-Year Outcomes of the Ranibizumab for Edema of the mAcula in Diabetes (READ-2) Study
Nguyen, Q. D., Shah, S. M., Khwaja, A. A., Channa, R., Hatef, E., Do, D. V., Boyer, D., Heier, J. S., Abraham, P., Thach, A. B., et al. (2010) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.08.016 · Cited by 532
Self-citationCampochiaro, P. A., Brown, D. M., Pearson, A., Ciulla, T., Boyer, D., Holz, F. G., Tolentino, M., Gupta, A., Duarte, L., Madreperla, S., et al. (2011) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.12.028 · Cited by 405
Self-citationVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Is a Critical Stimulus for Diabetic Macular Edema
Nguyen, Q. D., Tatlipinar, S., Shah, S. M., Haller, J. A., Quinlan, E., Sung, J., Zimmer-Galler, I., Do, D. V., & Campochiaro, P. A. (2006) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2006.06.068 · Cited by 351
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Nguyen, Q. D., Shah, S. M., Van Anden, E., Sung, J. U., Vitale, S., & Campochiaro, P. A.
- Venue
- Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
- Published
- 2004-02-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 617
- ISSN
- 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5783
- OpenAlex
- W1985788023
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 0
- Type
- supplementary materials
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Supplemental Oxygen Improves Diabetic Macular Edema: A Pilot Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1167/iovs.03-0557
- The paper
- Nguyen, Q. D., Shah, S. M., Van Anden, E., Sung, J. U., Vitale, S., & Campochiaro, P. A. (2004). Supplemental Oxygen Improves Diabetic Macular Edema: A Pilot Study. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.03-0557
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.