Association of Apolipoprotein E Alleles with Susceptibility to Age-Related Macular Degeneration in a Large Cohort from a Single Center
Abstract
PURPOSE: To examine the effect of apolipoprotein E (APOE) alleles on age-related macular degeneration (AMD) risk and on age at diagnosis of AMD in a large patient cohort recruited from a single center. METHODS: The frequency of APOE alleles was analyzed in 632 unrelated AMD patients and 206 unrelated controls, all of whom were of white ancestry. The presence or absence of disease symptoms in all patients and controls was based on clinical examination and/or ophthalmic records. The association with APOE was explored in the context of AMD subtypes, family history status, possible interaction with smoking, and distribution of age at diagnosis of AMD. RESULTS: The frequency of the epsilon4 allele was significantly reduced in patients compared with controls (0.10 vs. 0.14, P < or = 0.02). Gender- and age-adjusted odds ratios indicated that epsilon4-carriers have significantly lower risk of developing AMD compared to epsilon3epsilon3 subjects (OR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.37-0.82, P = 0.004). In the cohort, AMD patients with a positive family history exhibited a significant 3.5 years earlier age at diagnosis (P = 0.001); however, APOE alleles did not appear to modulate the age at diagnosis of AMD. CONCLUSIONS: The association between the APOE-epsilon4 allele and a reduced risk of AMD was established in a large cohort with sufficient statistical power. How distinct APOE alleles affect AMD susceptibility warrants further investigation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Individually, APOE candidate gene studies have been relatively small and evidence for association has been modest, although together the published studies provide stronger evidence of an association between APOE and AMD.
“Individually, these studies have been relatively small, and evidence for association has been modest, although together the published studies provide stronger evidence of an association between APOE and AMD (10, 129, 177).”
From Unraveling a Multifactorial Late-Onset Disease: From Genetic Susceptibility to Disease Mechanisms for Age-Related Macular Degeneration (2009) · cites this paper as [177]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 145
- Authors
- Zareparsi, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zareparsi, S.
- Venue
- Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
- Published
- 2004-05-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1306-1310
- ISSN
- 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2041625092
- Cited by
- 145
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 16.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Eye Institute (F32EY014085)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
- Keywords
- apolipoprotein E, APOE ε4, age-related macular degeneration, genetic susceptibility, age at diagnosis, family history (medicine), smoking, genetic association
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Alleles, Apolipoproteins E, DNA, Female, Gene Frequency, Genotype, Humans, Macular Degeneration, Male, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Apolipoprotein E4
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review