Cited by 145Retinal Diseases and TreatmentsRetinal Imaging and AnalysisRetinal Development and Disorders

Association of Apolipoprotein E Alleles with Susceptibility to Age-Related Macular Degeneration in a Large Cohort from a Single Center

Zareparsi, S.·2004·Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the effect of apolipoprotein E (APOE) alleles on age-related macular degeneration (AMD) risk and on age at diagnosis of AMD in a large patient cohort recruited from a single center. METHODS: The frequency of APOE alleles was analyzed in 632 unrelated AMD patients and 206 unrelated controls, all of whom were of white ancestry. The presence or absence of disease symptoms in all patients and controls was based on clinical examination and/or ophthalmic records. The association with APOE was explored in the context of AMD subtypes, family history status, possible interaction with smoking, and distribution of age at diagnosis of AMD. RESULTS: The frequency of the epsilon4 allele was significantly reduced in patients compared with controls (0.10 vs. 0.14, P < or = 0.02). Gender- and age-adjusted odds ratios indicated that epsilon4-carriers have significantly lower risk of developing AMD compared to epsilon3epsilon3 subjects (OR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.37-0.82, P = 0.004). In the cohort, AMD patients with a positive family history exhibited a significant 3.5 years earlier age at diagnosis (P = 0.001); however, APOE alleles did not appear to modulate the age at diagnosis of AMD. CONCLUSIONS: The association between the APOE-epsilon4 allele and a reduced risk of AMD was established in a large cohort with sufficient statistical power. How distinct APOE alleles affect AMD susceptibility warrants further investigation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1167/iovs.03-1253

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 145

Authors
Zareparsi, S.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Zareparsi, S.
Venue
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
Published
2004-05-01
Volume
45
Issue
5
Pages
1306-1310
ISSN
0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2041625092
Cited by
145
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
16.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Eye Institute (F32EY014085)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
Keywords
apolipoprotein E, APOE ε4, age-related macular degeneration, genetic susceptibility, age at diagnosis, family history (medicine), smoking, genetic association
MeSH terms
Aged, Alleles, Apolipoproteins E, DNA, Female, Gene Frequency, Genotype, Humans, Macular Degeneration, Male, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Apolipoprotein E4

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review