Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 183

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Prevalence of Open-Angle Glaucoma in a Rural South Indian Population

Vijaya, Lingam, George, Ronnie, Paul, Pradeep G., Baskaran, Mani, Arvind, Hemamalini, Raju, Prema, Ramesh, S. Ve, Kumaramanickavel, Govindasamy, McCarty, Catherine·2005·Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and the associated risk factors in a rural population in southern India. METHODS: Subjects aged 40 years or more (n = 3934) underwent a complete ophthalmic examination. Glaucoma was diagnosed according to the International Society of Geographical and Epidemiologic Ophthalmology classification. RESULTS: Complete data were available for 3924 subjects (response rate, 81.75%). In eyes with normal suprathreshold visual fields, the mean intraocular pressure was 14.29 +/- 3.32 mm Hg (97.5th and 99.5th percentiles, 21 and 25 mm Hg, respectively). The mean vertical cup-to-disc ratio was 0.39 +/- 0.17 (97.5th and 99.5th percentiles, 0.7 and 0.8, respectively). Sixty-four subjects had definite POAG (1.62%, 9.5% CI 1.42-1.82); 30 were men and 34 were women. Subjects with POAG (59.85 +/- 10.43 years) were older (P < 0.001) than the study population (53.78 +/- 10.71 years). In only one (1.5%) person was POAG diagnosed before the study. Two (3.12%) subjects were blind due to POAG; 21 (32.81%) subjects had a presenting IOP >21 mm Hg, and 43 (67.19%) had an IOP <21 mm Hg. The mean central corneal thickness in subjects with POAG (502.82 +/- 35.29 microm) was not different from that of the normal study population (505.93 +/- 31.11 microm). No association was found with diabetes mellitus, systemic hypertension, gender, and myopia. Increasing IOP (per mm Hg) was associated with the disease (OR 1.12; 95% CI, 1.08-1.16). The odds for POAG increased with advancing age after adjustment for gender. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of POAG in this population was 1.62%. The prevalence increased with age, and 98.5% were not aware of the disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1167/iovs.04-1529

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 183

Metadata

Authors
Vijaya, L., George, R., Paul, P. G., Baskaran, M., Arvind, H., Raju, P., Ramesh, S. V., Kumaramanickavel, G., & McCarty, C.
Venue
Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
Published
2005-12-01
Volume
46
Issue
12
Pages
4461
ISSN
  • 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5783
OpenAlex
W1976656431
Cited by
183
References
0
FWCI
6.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence of Open-Angle Glaucoma in a Rural South Indian Population. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1167/iovs.04-1529
The paper
Vijaya, L., George, R., Paul, P. G., Baskaran, M., Arvind, H., Raju, P., Ramesh, S. V., Kumaramanickavel, G., & McCarty, C. (2005). Prevalence of Open-Angle Glaucoma in a Rural South Indian Population. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.04-1529

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.