Cited by 51Retinal Development and DisordersCell death mechanisms and regulationRetinal Diseases and Treatments

Inactivation of the Akt survival pathway during photoreceptor apoptosis in the retinal degeneration mouse

Jomary, Catherine, Cullen, Jason, Jones, Stephen E.·2006·Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science

Abstract

PURPOSE: Previous work has indicated that the serine-threonine protein kinase Akt is a general mediator of cellular survival signals and that loss of Akt-mediated signaling can lead to the activation of apoptosis. This study was conducted to establish whether regulation of the Akt survival pathway mechanisms is implicated in the induction of apoptosis during photoreceptor cell death in the rd mouse model of retinal degeneration. METHODS: Quantitative Western blot analysis and immunocytochemistry were used to examine the activation status and localization of key components of the Akt signaling cascade (Akt, BAD, Forkhead [FKHR], HSP27, mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase kinase-3 and -6 (MKK3/6), the tumor-suppressor phosphatase PTEN, and the cytoplasmic protein-tyrosine kinase cSrc-p60), in the retina of the rd mouse in comparison with the control. The time points examined spanned the period of photoreceptor degeneration. RESULTS: In the period up to the peak of photoreceptor apoptosis at postnatal day 15, dysregulation of the survival pathway was identified at several levels, including deactivation of both Akt itself and its downstream transcription factor target Forkhead (FKHR) and activation of the upstream negative regulator PTEN. CONCLUSIONS: Taken in conjunction with previous studies, the data support a model in which photoreceptor cell death in the rd mouse is the result of combined inactivation of the Akt survival pathway and the activation of the two major apoptotic pathways.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1167/iovs.05-1176

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 60 · Cited by 51

Authors
Jomary, C., Cullen, J., & Jones, S. E.
Affiliations
St Thomas' Hospital (GB)
Venue
Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
Published
2006-04-01
Volume
47
Issue
4
Pages
1620
ISSN
  • 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5783
OpenAlex
W2045884328
Cited by
51
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cell death mechanisms and regulation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
Keywords
Akt signaling, photoreceptor apoptosis, retinal degeneration, rd mouse, survival pathways, PTEN, forkhead transcription factor, Bad, HSP27, Src kinase
MeSH terms
Forkhead Box Protein O1, Animals, Cell Survival, Heat-Shock Proteins, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Mutant Strains, Phosphorylation, Retinal Degeneration, Blotting, Western, Signal Transduction, Proto-Oncogene Proteins pp60(c-src), Apoptosis, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect, Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases, Photoreceptor Cells, Vertebrate, MAP Kinase Kinase 3, MAP Kinase Kinase 6, bcl-Associated Death Protein, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt, PTEN Phosphohydrolase, Mice, Forkhead Transcription Factors, HSP27 Heat-Shock Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review