The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prevalence of Disease-Causing Mutations in Families with Autosomal Dominant Retinitis Pigmentosa: A Screen of Known Genes in 200 Families
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: To survey families with clinical evidence of autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (adRP) for mutations in genes known to cause adRP. METHODS: Two hundred adRP families, drawn from a cohort of more than 400 potential families, were selected by analysis of pedigrees. Minimum criteria for inclusion in the adRP cohort included either evidence of at least three generations of affected individuals or two generations with evidence of male-to-male transmission. Probands from each family were screened for mutations in 13 genes known to cause adRP: CA4, CRX, FSCN2, IMPDH1, NRL, PRPF3 (RP18), PRPF8 (RP13), PRPF31 (RP11), RDS, RHO, ROM1, RP1, and RP9. Families without mutations in autosomal genes and in which an X-linked mode of inheritance could not be excluded were tested for mutations in ORF 15 of X-linked RPGR. Potentially pathogenic variants were evaluated based on a variety of genetic and computational criteria, to confirm or exclude pathogenicity. RESULTS: A total of 82 distinct, rare (nonpolymorphic) variants were detected among the genes tested. Of these, 57 are clearly pathogenic based on multiple criteria, 10 are probably pathogenic, and 15 are probably benign. In the cohort of 200 families, 94 (47%) have one of the clearly pathogenic variants and 10 (5%) have one of the probably pathogenic variants. One family (0.5%) has digenic RDS-ROM1 mutations. Two families (1%) have a pathogenic RPGR mutation, indicating that families with apparent autosomal transmission of RP may actually have X-linked genetic disease. Thus, 107 families (53.5%) have mutations in known genes, leaving 93 whose underlying cause is still unknown. CONCLUSIONS: Together, the known adRP genes account for retinal disease in approximately half of the families in this survey, mostly Americans of European origin. Among the adRP genes, IMPDH1, PRPF8, PRPF31, RDS, RHO, and RP1 each accounts for more than 2% of the total; CRX, PRPF3, and RPGR each accounts for roughly 1%. Disease-causing mutations were not found in CA4, FSCN2, NRL, or RP9. Because some mutations are frequent and some regions are more likely to harbor mutations than others, more than two thirds of the detected mutations can be found by screening less than 10% of the total gene sequences. Among the remaining families, mutations may lie in regions of known genes that were not tested, mutations may not be detectable by PCR-based sequencing, or other loci may be involved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A point mutation of the rhodopsin gene in one form of retinitis pigmentosa
Dryja, T. P., McGee, T. L., Reichel, E., Hahn, L. B., Cowley, G. S., Yandell, D. W., Sandberg, M. A., & Berson, E. L. (1990) · Nature · doi:10.1038/343364a0 · Cited by 1,072
Cited by
Leber congenital amaurosis: Genes, proteins and disease mechanisms
den Hollander, A. I., Roepman, R., Koenekoop, R. K., & Cremers, F. P. M. (2008) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2008.05.003 · Cited by 811
Wang, X., Wang, H., Sun, V., Tuan, H.-F., Keser, V., Wang, K., Ren, H., Lopez, I., Zaneveld, J. E., Siddiqui, S., et al. (2013) · Journal of Medical Genetics · doi:10.1136/jmedgenet-2013-101558 · Cited by 159
Self-citationMutation-independent rhodopsin gene therapy by knockdown and replacement with a single AAV vector
Cideciyan, A. V., Sudharsan, R., Dufour, V. L., Massengill, M. T., Iwabe, S., Swider, M., Lisi, B., Sumaroka, A., Marinho, L. F., Appelbaum, T., et al. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1805055115 · Cited by 147
Deretic, D. (2006) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2006.07.028 · Cited by 86
Cone photoreceptor mosaic disruption associated with Cys203Arg mutation in the M-cone opsin
Carroll, J., Baraas, R. C., Wagner-Schuman, M., Rha, J., Siebe, C. A., Sloan, C., Tait, D. M., Thompson, S., Morgan, J. I. W., Neitz, J., et al. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0910128106 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Sullivan, L. S., Bowne, S. J., Birch, D. G., Hughbanks-Wheaton, D., Heckenlively, J. R., Lewis, R. A., Garcia, C. A., Ruiz, R. S., Blanton, S. H., Northrup, H., Gire, A. I., Seaman, R., Duzkale, H., Spellicy, C. J., Zhu, J., Shankar, S. P., & Daiger, S. P.
- Venue
- Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
- Published
- 2006-07-01
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 3052
- ISSN
- 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5783
- OpenAlex
- W2154826595
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence of Disease-Causing Mutations in Families with Autosomal Dominant Retinitis Pigmentosa: A Screen of Known Genes in 200 Families. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1167/iovs.05-1443
- The paper
- Sullivan, L. S., Bowne, S. J., Birch, D. G., Hughbanks-Wheaton, D., Heckenlively, J. R., Lewis, R. A., Garcia, C. A., Ruiz, R. S., Blanton, S. H., Northrup, H., Gire, A. I., Seaman, R., Duzkale, H., Spellicy, C. J., Zhu, J., Shankar, S. P., & Daiger, S. P. (2006). Prevalence of Disease-Causing Mutations in Families with Autosomal Dominant Retinitis Pigmentosa: A Screen of Known Genes in 200 Families. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.05-1443
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.