Cited by 157Retinal Development and DisordersPhotoreceptor and optogenetics researchConnexins and lens biology

Cone Photoreceptor Function Loss-3, a Novel Mouse Model of Achromatopsia Due to a Mutation in Gnat2

Open access
Chang, Bo, Dacey, Mark S., Hawes, Norm L., Hitchcock, Peter F., Milam, Ann H., Atmaca-Sonmez, Pelin, Nusinowitz, Steven, Heckenlively, John R.·2006·Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report a novel mouse model of achromatopsia with a cpfl3 mutation found in the ALS/LtJ strain. METHODS: The effects of a cpfl3 mutation were documented using fundus photography, electroretinography (ERG), and histopathology. Genetic analysis was performed using linkage studies and PCR gene identification. RESULTS: Homozygous cpfl3 mice had poor cone-mediated responses on ERG at 3 weeks that became undetectable by 9 months. Rod-mediated waveforms were initially normal, but declined with age. Microscopy of the retinas revealed progressive vacuolization of the photoreceptor outer segments. Immunocytochemistry with cone-specific markers showed progressive loss of labeling for alpha-transducin, but the cone outer segments in the oldest mice examined remained intact and positive with peanut agglutinin (PNA). The cpfl3 mapped to mouse chromosome 3 at the same location as human GNAT2, known to cause achromatopsia. Sequence analysis revealed a missense mutation due to a single base pair substitution in exon 6 in cpfl3. CONCLUSIONS: The Gnat2(cpfl3) mutation leads to cone dysfunction and the progressive loss of cone alpha-transducin immunolabeling. Despite a poor cone ERG signal and loss of cone alpha-transducin label, the cones survive at 14 weeks as demonstrated by PNA staining. This mouse model of achromatopsia will be useful in the study of the development, pathophysiology, and treatment of achromatopsia and other cone degenerations. The gene symbol for the cpfl3 mutation has been changed to Gnat2(cpfl3).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1167/iovs.05-1468

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 21 · Cited by 157

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Nusinowitz S RW, Heckenlively JR. Systemic Evaluation of the Mouse Eye. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2002:320 -344.
  2. Milam AH. Immunocytochemical studies of the retina: vision re- search protocols. Methods Mol Med. 2000;47:71-88.

Authors
Chang, B., Dacey, M. S., Hawes, N. L., Hitchcock, P. F., Milam, A. H., Atmaca-Sonmez, P., Nusinowitz, S., & Heckenlively, J. R.
Affiliations
  • Jackson Laboratory (US)
  • Departments of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences and
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
Published
2006-11-01
Volume
47
Issue
11
Pages
5017
ISSN
  • 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5783
OpenAlex
W2066482151
Cited by
157
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
FWCI
2.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Mouseion at the JAXlibrary (Jackson Laboratory) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Research to Prevent Blindness
  • National Eye Institute (EY 07003, R01EY007758, EY 11996, EY07758, R01EY007060, R01EY011996)
  • National Cancer Institute (#CA34196, P30CA034196)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Connexins and lens biology
Keywords
achromatopsia, GNAT2, cone photoreceptors, cone degeneration, missense mutations, mouse model, electroretinogram, retinal histopathology, rod photoreceptors, chromosome 3
MeSH terms
Animals, Chromosome Mapping, Color Vision Defects, Disease Models, Animal, Electroretinography, Genotype, Genetic Linkage, Mice, Mutant Strains, Photography, Retinal Degeneration, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Retinal Cone Photoreceptor Cells, Mutation, Missense, Heterotrimeric GTP-Binding Proteins, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review