The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Human Macula Investigated In Vivo with Polarization-Sensitive Optical Coherence Tomography
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate a depolarizing layer that is visible in polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography (PS-OCT) images of the retina. To identify this layer and characterize its depolarizing effect quantitatively. METHODS: Ten healthy human subjects (mean age, 31 +/- 8 years) and two patients with RPE diseases participated in the study. The macular region of one eye of each subject was investigated with a phase-resolved PS-OCT system. The instrument measured backscattered intensity (standard OCT), phase retardation, and (cumulative) birefringent axis orientation, simultaneously. For a quantification of the depolarizing layer, plots of the distributions of retardation and axis orientation within and above this layer were analyzed. RESULTS: A polarization-scrambling layer (PSL) was observed at the posterior boundary of the retina in PS-OCT images of all volunteers. It was identified in PS-OCT images by determining random retardation and axis orientation in a transverse direction. Measurements in patients with neurosensory retinal detachment, retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) detachment, and RPE atrophy suggest that the PSL is the RPE. The statistical analysis provided objective discrimination of the RPE from the other retinal structures. CONCLUSIONS: PS-OCT represents a powerful tool for increasing image contrast in ocular tissues. The observed polarization-scrambling nature of the RPE may be used in diseased eyes to locate the RPE or remains of the RPE definitively in OCT images.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ultrahigh-resolution ophthalmic optical coherence tomography
Drexler, W., Morgner, U., Ghanta, R. K., Kärtner, F. X., Schuman, J. S., & Fujimoto, J. G. (2001) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/86589 · Cited by 962
Cited by
State-of-the-art retinal optical coherence tomography
DREXLER, W., & FUJIMOTO, J. (2008) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2007.07.005 · Cited by 906
Optical Coherence Tomography: History, Current Status, and Laboratory Work
Gabriele, M. L., Wollstein, G., Ishikawa, H., Kagemann, L., Xu, J., Folio, L. S., & Schuman, J. S. (2011) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.10-6312 · Cited by 310
Polarization sensitive optical coherence tomography in the human eye
Pircher, M., Hitzenberger, C. K., & Schmidt-Erfurth, U. (2011) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2011.06.003 · Cited by 288
Self-citationOptical coherence tomography – development, principles, applications
Fercher, A. F. (2010) · Zeitschrift für Medizinische Physik · doi:10.1016/j.zemedi.2009.11.002 · Cited by 259
Baumann, B., Baumann, S. O., Konegger, T., Pircher, M., Götzinger, E., Schlanitz, F., Schütze, C., Sattmann, H., Litschauer, M., Schmidt-Erfurth, U., et al. (2012) · Biomedical Optics Express · doi:10.1364/boe.3.001670 · Cited by 163
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Pircher, M., Go¨tzinger, E., Findl, O., Michels, S., Geitzenauer, W., Leydolt, C., Schmidt-Erfurth, U., & Hitzenberger, C. K.
- Venue
- Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
- Published
- 2006-12-01
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 5487
- ISSN
- 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5783
- OpenAlex
- W2074416353
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.