The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cultivated Corneal Endothelial Cell Sheet Transplantation in a Primate Model
Abstract
PURPOSE: To examine the feasibility of cultivated corneal endothelial cell transplantation in a primate model. METHODS: Monkey corneal endothelial cells (MCECs) obtained from three cynomolgus monkeys were cultivated, with subcultures grown on collagen type I carriers for 4 weeks. The corneal endothelium of the right eye of six monkeys was mechanically scraped, after which a cultivated MCEC sheet was brought into the anterior chamber of four eyes and fixed to Descemet's membrane by air. As the control, a collagen sheet without MCECs was transplanted into one eye of one monkey, and a suspension of cultivated MCECs was injected into the anterior chamber in one eye. RESULTS: Cultivated MCECs produced a confluent monolayer of closely attached hexagonal cells that showed both ZO-1 and Na(+)-K(+) ATPase expression. In the early postoperative period MCEC sheets were attached to Descemet's membrane and corneal clarity was recovered. The recovered clarity was accompanied by a decrease in corneal thickness. Fluorescein DiI labeled donor corneal endothelial cells were detected on the host cornea on postoperative day 7. Six months after transplantation MCEC-transplanted corneas remained clear, and hexagonal cells were observed by in vivo specular microscopy with a density of 1992 to 2475 cells/mm(2). Control eyes showed irreversible bullous keratopathy that precluded pachymetry and specular microscopy. CONCLUSIONS: A model of cultivated corneal endothelial transplantation for corneal endothelial dysfunction was established in primates whose corneal endothelial cells have less proliferative capacity in vivo. Our results suggest that this is a useful model for long-term observation in advance of the future clinical application of cultivated corneal endothelial transplantation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Takezawa, T., Ozaki, K., Nitani, A., Takabayashi, C., & Shimo-Oka, T. (2004) · Cell Transplantation · doi:10.3727/000000004783983882 · Cited by 165
Cited by
Hos, D., Matthaei, M., Bock, F., Maruyama, K., Notara, M., Clahsen, T., Hou, Y., Le, V. N. H., Salabarria, A.-C., Horstmann, J., et al. (2019) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2019.07.001 · Cited by 303
Enhancement on Primate Corneal Endothelial Cell Survival In Vitro by a ROCK Inhibitor
Okumura, N., Ueno, M., Koizumi, N., Sakamoto, Y., Hirata, K., Hamuro, J., & Kinoshita, S. (2009) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.08-2634 · Cited by 300
Self-citationFuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy: The vicious cycle of Fuchs pathogenesis
Ong Tone, S., Kocaba, V., Böhm, M., Wylegala, A., White, T. L., & Jurkunas, U. V. (2021) · Progress in Retinal and Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2020.100863 · Cited by 284
Okumura, N., Koizumi, N., Ueno, M., Sakamoto, Y., Takahashi, H., Tsuchiya, H., Hamuro, J., & Kinoshita, S. (2012) · The American Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1016/j.ajpath.2012.03.033 · Cited by 257
Self-citationHongo, A., Okumura, N., Nakahara, M., Kay, E. P., & Koizumi, N. (2017) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.16-21170 · Cited by 53
Self-citationEffect of a p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Inhibitor on Corneal Endothelial Cell Proliferation
Nakahara, M., Okumura, N., Nakano, S., & Koizumi, N. (2018) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.18-24394 · Cited by 30
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Koizumi, N., Sakamoto, Y., Okumura, N., Okahara, N., Tsuchiya, H., Torii, R., Cooper, L. J., Ban, Y., Tanioka, H., & Kinoshita, S.
- Venue
- Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
- Published
- 2007-10-01
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 4519
- ISSN
- 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5783
- OpenAlex
- W2009101760
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.