Cited by 50Retinal Development and DisordersRedox biology and oxidative stressAntioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress

An Hypothesis to Account for the Renewal of Outer Segments in Rod and Cone Photoreceptor Cells: Renewal as a Surrogate Antioxidant

Winkler, Barry S.·2008·Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science

Abstract

It is undisputed that glutathione (GSH) is an important cellular antioxidant. Although it is commonly believed that GSH is present in all retinal cells, several publications show that GSH is not immunologically detectable in outer segments of rod and cone photoreceptor cells, but is present in inner retinal cells and the pigment epithelium. Using these intriguing and surprising findings as a starting point, an hypothesis is proposed that the renewal of outer segments serves as a surrogate antioxidant for GSH and that the exceptional vulnerability of photoreceptor cells to certain toxic chemicals is linked to the deficiency in GSH in outer segments as a reductant, a detoxicant, and as an enzymatic cofactor. It is suggested that this deficiency of GSH is not damaging to outer segments under normal conditions, because renewal serves to replace any damaged molecules before they increase to detrimental levels. However, when photoreceptors are stressed, the renewal of outer segments alone is not capable of overcoming the higher rates of oxidizing and detrimental chemical reactions, and the health of the entire photoreceptor cell is at risk. The hypothesis is supported by a consideration of the essential role of the NADPH-dependent retinol reductase, by the different localization within photoreceptor cells of two key metabolic enzymes that are sensitive to oxidation, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and the sodium-potassium ATPase, and by a consideration of the effects of toxic chemicals that selectively damage photoreceptor cells.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1167/iovs.08-1785

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 51 · Cited by 50

Authors
Winkler, B. S.
Affiliations
Oakland University (US)
Corresponding author
Winkler, Barry S.
Venue
Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
Published
2008-08-01
Volume
49
Issue
8
Pages
3259
ISSN
  • 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5783
OpenAlex
W2033248675
Cited by
50
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Redox biology and oxidative stress
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
Keywords
glutathione, antioxidant defense, rod photoreceptors, cone photoreceptors, oxidative stress, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, Na+/K+-ATPase, retinal metabolism
MeSH terms
Sodium-Potassium-Exchanging ATPase, Animals, Antioxidants, Glutathione, Humans, Philosophy, Retinal Degeneration, Rod Cell Outer Segment, Oxidative Stress, Photoreceptor Cells, Vertebrate, Glyceraldehyde 3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase (NADP+)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review