The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Photoreceptor Inner/Outer Segment Defect Imaging by Spectral Domain OCT and Visual Prognosis after Macular Hole Surgery
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate photoreceptor inner/outer segment (IS/OS) defect parameters by using spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) for correlation with visual outcomes in macular hole surgery (MHS). METHODS: This study was an interventional, retrospective case series. Twenty-three eyes (23 patients) were examined by SD-OCT before and after (median, 2.3 months) anatomically successful MHS. Two formats of OCT were analyzed: linear (raster) and composite (partial fundus image). Factors that may have confounded IS/OS measurements were controlled by using weighting and normalization of data. The main outcome measures were diameter and area of the IS/OS defect, weighted area of the IS/OS defect, macular density ratio (MDR), healing pattern of the macular hole, and preoperative and postoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). RESULTS: Poorer preoperative BCVA correlated with larger preoperative diameter of the IS/OS defect (P = 0.005). A greater improvement in BCVA correlated with a larger preoperative area of IS/OS defect (P = 0.038) and smaller MDR (P = 0.012). Poorer postoperative BCVA correlated with a larger postoperative diameter of the IS/OS defect (P = 0.010), larger weighted postoperative area of IS/OS defect calculated by raster scan (P = 0.013), larger postoperative area of IS/OS defect measured from the partial fundus image (P = 0.003), and apparent glial sealing pattern on SD-OCT (P = 0.0005). The shape of the IS/OS defect area was round and regular before surgery, but irregular afterward. CONCLUSIONS: BCVA after MHS correlates with objectively ascertainable SD-OCT measurements of IS/OS defects and other features. The postoperative area of the IS/OS defect, when directly measured, correlates more strongly with BCVA than do linear-based measurements, perhaps because of the irregular shape of the IS/OS defect after surgery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Central Serous Chorioretinopathy: Update on Pathophysiology and Treatment
Nicholson, B., Noble, J., Forooghian, F., & Meyerle, C. (2013) · Survey of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2012.07.004 · Cited by 649
Optical Coherence Tomography: History, Current Status, and Laboratory Work
Gabriele, M. L., Wollstein, G., Ishikawa, H., Kagemann, L., Xu, J., Folio, L. S., & Schuman, J. S. (2011) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.10-6312 · Cited by 310
AGE-RELATED CLINICAL OUTCOME AFTER MACULAR HOLE SURGERY
Kim, Y., KIM, E. S., Yu, S.-Y., & Kwak, H. W. (2017) · Retina · doi:10.1097/iae.0000000000001162 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Oh, J., Smiddy, W. E., Flynn, H. W., Gregori, G., & Lujan, B.
- Venue
- Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
- Published
- 2010-03-01
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1651
- ISSN
- 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5783
- OpenAlex
- W1995397454
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Photoreceptor Inner/Outer Segment Defect Imaging by Spectral Domain OCT and Visual Prognosis after Macular Hole Surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1167/iovs.09-4420
- The paper
- Oh, J., Smiddy, W. E., Flynn, H. W., Gregori, G., & Lujan, B. (2010). Photoreceptor Inner/Outer Segment Defect Imaging by Spectral Domain OCT and Visual Prognosis after Macular Hole Surgery. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.09-4420
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.