Cited by 77Retinal Development and DisordersRetinal Diseases and TreatmentsPluripotent Stem Cells Research

Developing cellular therapies for retinal degenerative diseases

Open access
Bharti, Kapil, Rao, Mahendra, Hull, Sara Chandros, Stroncek, David, Brooks, Brian P., Feigal, Ellen, van Meurs, Jan C., Huang, Christene A. +1 more·2014·Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science

Abstract

Biomedical advances in vision research have been greatly facilitated by the clinical accessibility of the visual system, its ease of experimental manipulation, and its ability to be functionally monitored in real time with noninvasive imaging techniques at the level of single cells and with quantitative end-point measures. A recent example is the development of stem cell-based therapies for degenerative eye diseases including AMD. Two phase I clinical trials using embryonic stem cell-derived RPE are already underway and several others using both pluripotent and multipotent adult stem cells are in earlier stages of development. These clinical trials will use a variety of cell types, including embryonic or induced pluripotent stem cell-derived RPE, bone marrow- or umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells, fetal neural or retinal progenitor cells, and adult RPE stem cells-derived RPE. Although quite distinct, these approaches, share common principles, concerns and issues across the clinical development pipeline. These considerations were a central part of the discussions at a recent National Eye Institute meeting on the development of cellular therapies for retinal degenerative disease. At this meeting, emphasis was placed on the general value of identifying and sharing information in the so-called "precompetitive space." The utility of this behavior was described in terms of how it could allow us to remove road blocks in the clinical development pipeline, and more efficiently and economically move stem cell-based therapies for retinal degenerative diseases toward the clinic. Many of the ocular stem cell approaches we discuss are also being used more broadly, for nonocular conditions and therefore the model we develop here, using the precompetitive space, should benefit the entire scientific community.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1167/iovs.13-13481

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 59 · Cited by 77

Authors
Bharti, K., Rao, M., Hull, S. C., Stroncek, D., Brooks, B. P., Feigal, E., van Meurs, J. C., Huang, C. A., & Miller, S. S.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (US)
  • Rotterdam University Eye Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Bharti, Kapil
Venue
Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
Published
2014-02-26
Volume
55
Issue
2
Pages
1191
ISSN
  • 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5783
OpenAlex
W2322363882
Cited by
77
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 8
FWCI
5.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • California Institute for Regenerative Medicine
  • California Institute of Regenerative Medicine
  • Stem Cell Network
  • National Institutes of Health
  • NIH Clinical Center
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
Keywords
retinal degeneration, stem cell therapy, retinal pigment epithelium, age-related macular degeneration, induced pluripotent stem cells, mesenchymal stem cells, retinal progenitor cells, pre-competitive collaboration
MeSH terms
Animals, Clinical Trials as Topic, Congresses as Topic, Cooperative Behavior, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Retinal Degeneration, United States, Stem Cell Transplantation, Pluripotent Stem Cells, Regenerative Medicine, Embryonic Stem Cells, National Eye Institute (U.S.), Translational Research, Biomedical, Cell Engineering, Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review