Developing cellular therapies for retinal degenerative diseases
Open accessAbstract
Biomedical advances in vision research have been greatly facilitated by the clinical accessibility of the visual system, its ease of experimental manipulation, and its ability to be functionally monitored in real time with noninvasive imaging techniques at the level of single cells and with quantitative end-point measures. A recent example is the development of stem cell-based therapies for degenerative eye diseases including AMD. Two phase I clinical trials using embryonic stem cell-derived RPE are already underway and several others using both pluripotent and multipotent adult stem cells are in earlier stages of development. These clinical trials will use a variety of cell types, including embryonic or induced pluripotent stem cell-derived RPE, bone marrow- or umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells, fetal neural or retinal progenitor cells, and adult RPE stem cells-derived RPE. Although quite distinct, these approaches, share common principles, concerns and issues across the clinical development pipeline. These considerations were a central part of the discussions at a recent National Eye Institute meeting on the development of cellular therapies for retinal degenerative disease. At this meeting, emphasis was placed on the general value of identifying and sharing information in the so-called "precompetitive space." The utility of this behavior was described in terms of how it could allow us to remove road blocks in the clinical development pipeline, and more efficiently and economically move stem cell-based therapies for retinal degenerative diseases toward the clinic. Many of the ocular stem cell approaches we discuss are also being used more broadly, for nonocular conditions and therefore the model we develop here, using the precompetitive space, should benefit the entire scientific community.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
If the surgeon does not observe leakage, it is assumed that all the injected volume is successfully delivered.
“If the surgeon does not observe any leakage, it is assumed that all the injected volume is successfully delivered (18–21).”
From Subretinal therapy: technological solutions to surgical and immunological challenges (2022) · cites this paper as [18]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 59 · Cited by 77
- Authors
- Bharti, K., Rao, M., Hull, S. C., Stroncek, D., Brooks, B. P., Feigal, E., van Meurs, J. C., Huang, C. A., & Miller, S. S.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (US)
- Rotterdam University Eye Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bharti, Kapil
- ORCID
- Venue
- Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
- Published
- 2014-02-26
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1191
- ISSN
- 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5783
- PMC
- PMC4587754
- OpenAlex
- W2322363882
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 8
- FWCI
- 5.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- California Institute for Regenerative Medicine
- California Institute of Regenerative Medicine
- Stem Cell Network
- National Institutes of Health
- NIH Clinical Center
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
- Keywords
- retinal degeneration, stem cell therapy, retinal pigment epithelium, age-related macular degeneration, induced pluripotent stem cells, mesenchymal stem cells, retinal progenitor cells, pre-competitive collaboration
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Clinical Trials as Topic, Congresses as Topic, Cooperative Behavior, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Retinal Degeneration, United States, Stem Cell Transplantation, Pluripotent Stem Cells, Regenerative Medicine, Embryonic Stem Cells, National Eye Institute (U.S.), Translational Research, Biomedical, Cell Engineering, Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review