Cited by 101Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringRetinal Development and DisordersPain Management and Treatment

One-Year Outcome of 49-Channel Suprachoroidal–Transretinal Stimulation Prosthesis in Patients With Advanced Retinitis Pigmentosa

Open access
Fujikado, Takashi, Kamei, Motohiro, Sakaguchi, Hirokazu, Kanda, Hiroyuki, Endo, Takao, Hirota, Masakazu, Morimoto, Takeshi, Nishida, Kentaro +5 more·2016·Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the feasibility of a 49-channel suprachoroidal-transretinal stimulation (STS) retinal prosthesis that was implanted for 1 year. METHODS: Three patients with advanced retinitis pigmentosa (RP) and with less than or equal to hand motion (HM) vision were studied. A 49-channel STS system was implanted in a scleral pocket, and the stability of the prosthesis, adverse events, and its efficacy were investigated. RESULTS: The electrode array was implanted in a scleral pocket located under the parafoveal area through a scleral incision at 14 mm in patient (Pt) 1, 16 mm in Pt 2, and 18 mm in Pt 3 from the sclerocorneal limbus. No complications occurred during surgery in all cases. During the follow-up period, iridocyclitis developed in Pt 2 and Pt 3, which was successfully treated with topical medications. The implanted devices continued functioning and elicited phosphenes in all cases. The results of localization tests (P < 0.05) and table tests (P < 0.05) were significantly better with the prosthesis turned on than turned off in Pt 3. The deviations of the walking tests were smaller with the prosthesis turned on than off in Pt 2 and Pt 3 at multiple times after the implantation. CONCLUSIONS: The 49-channel STS retinal prosthesis was able to elicit phosphenes in all patients with advanced RP for the entire 1-year experimental period without major complications. Better results on visual tasks were found in the eyes in which the electrode array was implanted closer to the fovea centralis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1167/iovs.16-20367

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies on suprachoroidal devices have generally assessed patient autonomy, mobility, and object discrimination, rather than visual acuity.

    “In comparison, studies on suprachoroidal devices25,36 have generally assessed patient autonomy, mobility, and object discrimination, rather than visual acuity.”
  • Suprachoroidal prostheses have good mechanical stability without fixation with retinal tacks and, like epiretinal prostheses, good heat dissipation capacity and allow the insertion of large arrays.

    “Like subretinal prostheses, they have good mechanical stability without fixation with retinal tacks [56,58] and, like epiretinal prostheses, they have good heat dissipation capacity and allow the insertion of large arrays [57].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 101

Authors
Fujikado, T., Kamei, M., Sakaguchi, H., Kanda, H., Endo, T., Hirota, M., Morimoto, T., Nishida, K., Kishima, H., Terasawa, Y., Oosawa, K., Ozawa, M., & Nishida, K.
Affiliations
  • The University of Osaka (JP)
  • Nidek (Japan) (JP)
Corresponding author
Fujikado, Takashi
Venue
Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
Published
2016-11-11
Volume
57
Issue
14
Pages
6147
ISSN
  • 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5783
OpenAlex
W2551557427
Cited by
101
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1
FWCI
6.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (26462684, 25293354, 15K16353)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
retinal prosthesis, retinitis pigmentosa, phosphenes, visual localization, walking performance, iridocyclitis
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Choroid, Electric Stimulation, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Feasibility Studies, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Prospective Studies, Retina, Retinitis Pigmentosa, Time Factors, Visual Acuity, Treatment Outcome, Visual Prosthesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review