Impact of diabetic retinopathy on sleep, mood, and quality of life
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is associated with retinal neuronal and vascular damage. DR has previously been shown to affect the photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (pRGCs). PRGCs are essential for the entrainment of circadian rhythms; thus, DR progression could lead to worsening sleep quality and mood. We investigate the relationship between increasing DR severity, and its impact on sleep quality and mood. Methods: A total of 430 participants with DR, and 303 healthy controls with no ocular disease or preexisting sleep disorders were recruited. DR severity was grouped as follows: 1, mild nonproliferative (NPDR); 2, moderate/severe NPDR; and 3, proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Sleep, mood, and quality of life were assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), quality of life (SF-36), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score (HADS) questionnaires. Data were analyzed by severity of DR, and correlated with sleep, QOL, and mood and compared to controls. Results: No significant difference between PSQI scores in the DR group or the control group was identified despite severity of DR. Mean anxiety and depression scores were within the normal range for both groups. Despite a lower general health and physical function, the DR group had lower anxiety scores than controls. Conclusions: These data show that even in severe DR, sleep quality is similar to controls. However, this could be explained by the majority of individuals in this study having good visual acuities in the better eye with a residual population of pRGCs remaining unaffected by DR.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Assessment of the psychological status of DR patients helps identify their psychological problems and provides appropriate targeted psychological interventions to improve quality of life and clinical outcomes.
“Assessment of the psychological status of DR patients helps identify their psychological problems, and provides appropriate and targeted psychological interventions to improve the quality of life and clinical outcomes.[15–17]”
From The effect of psychotherapy on anxiety, depression, and quality of life in patients with diabetic retinopathy: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [17]
The Methods (Assessments of Sleep, Mood, and Quality of Life; page unavailable) show that the study assessed anxiety and depression in patients with diabetic retinopathy, and the Results report participants with possible anxiety or depressive disorders. The paper does not report providing targeted psychological interventions or show that such interventions improve quality of life or clinical outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 46 · Cited by 35
- Authors
- Morjaria, R., Alexander, I., Purbrick, R. M. J., Safa, R., Chong, N. V., Wulff, K., Foster, R. G., Downes, S. M., & for the SOMNUS Study Group
- Affiliations
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, OMPI, Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, South Parks Road, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Corresponding author
- Downes, Susan M.
- Venue
- Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
- Published
- 2019-05-01
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2304
- ISSN
- 0146-0404 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5783
- PMC
- PMC6532697
- OpenAlex
- W2945303644
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 3.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (106174/Z/14/Z, 090684/Z/09/Z, 098461/Z/12/Z, 090684/Z/09/A)
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (A92181, A90305, 10558)
- University of Oxford
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
- Keywords
- diabetic retinopathy, sleep quality, mood, quality of life, anxiety, depression, retinal ganglion cells, circadian rhythm, proliferative diabetic retinopathy, non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy, disease severity
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety, Depression, Diabetic Retinopathy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Regression Analysis, Sleep, Visual Acuity, Case-Control Studies, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review