Hints for gentle submacular injection in non-human primates based on intraoperative OCT guidance
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: Delivery of Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products to the submacular space is increasingly evolving into a therapeutic modality. Cell replacement for age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and gene therapy for RPE65 are recent successful examples. Herein, a nonhuman primate (NHP) model was used to investigate surgical means to detach the macula. Methods: Sixteen eyes of 13 healthy macaques underwent a 25-gauge vitrectomy and subretinal injection of balanced salt solution monitored by microscope-integrated intraoperative optical coherence tomography (miOCT). The animals were followed with OCT and histology. Results: The miOCT monitoring allowed a more precise definition of surgical trauma ranging from an initial full-thickness foveal tear, or induction of a cystoid macular edema (CME), until no foveal defect was discernible, as the technique improved. However, as the subretinal fluid wave detached the fovea, the aforementioned lesions formed, whereas persistent retinal adhesion reproducibly proved to remain in the distal parafoveal semi-annulus. Measures to reduce foveal trauma during submacular fluid injection included reducing intraocular pressure, injection volume, and velocity, as well as the retinal location for bleb initiation, use of a vitreous tamponade, and a dual-bore subretinal cannula. Conclusions: A stable very low intraocular pressure and careful subretinal injection may avoid tangential macular stretching or mechanical CME formation, while vitreous tamponade may facilitate a more lamellar subretinal flow, all thereby reducing foveal trauma during submacular injection in NHP. Translational Relevance: These results can be relevant to any submacular surgery procedure used today, as they synergistically reduce the risk of compromising foveal integrity.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Any reflux should be avoided because release of cells to the vitreous cavity can induce an immune response or lead to formation of epiretinal membranes.
“Ideally, any reflux should be avoided as release of cells to the vitreous cavity can induce an immune response or lead to the formation of epiretinal membranes (20, 26–29).”
From Subretinal therapy: technological solutions to surgical and immunological challenges (2022) · cites this paper as [28]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 21
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [36]Gregori NZ, Lam BL, Davis JL. Intraoperative use of microscope-integrated optical coherence tomography for subretinal gene therapy delivery. Retina. 2019; 39(Suppl 1): S9– S12. 28426632
- Authors
- Tan, G. S. W., Liu, Z., Ilmarinen, T., Barathi, V. A., Chee, C. K., Lingam, G., Su, X., & Stanzel, B. V.
- Affiliations
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- Agency for Science, Technology and Research (SG)
- Tampere University (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Stanzel, Boris V.
- Venue
- Translational Vision Science & Technology
- Published
- 2021-01-07
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 10
- ISSN
- 2164-2591 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7804573
- OpenAlex
- W3120828781
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9
- FWCI
- 2.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Translational Vision Science & Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
- Tampere University Institutional Repository (Tampere University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal and Macular Surgery
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
- Keywords
- intraoperative optical coherence tomography, macular detachment, cystoid macular edema, vitrectomy, non-human primates, macaque, intraocular pressure, vitreous tamponade, advanced therapy medicinal products, age-related macular degeneration, retinal adhesion
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Macula Lutea, Primates, Visual Acuity, Vitrectomy, Tomography, Optical Coherence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review