Cited by 5Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsCardiac Fibrosis and RemodelingCongenital heart defects research

A ratiometric catalog of protein isoform shifts in the cardiac fetal gene program

Open access
Han, Yu, Binti, Shaonil, Wennersten, Sara A., Pandi, Boomathi, Ng, Dominic C.M., Lau, Edward, Lam, Maggie P.Y.·2025·JCI Insight

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Pathological cardiac remodeling is associated with the reactivation of fetal genes, yet the extent of the heart’s fetal gene program and its impact on proteome compositions remain incompletely understood. Here, using a proteome-wide protein ratio quantification strategy with mass spectrometry, we identified pervasive isoform usage shifts in fetal and postnatal mouse hearts, involving 145 pairs of highly homologous paralogs and alternative splicing–derived isoform proteins. Proteome-wide ratio comparisons readily rediscovered hallmark fetal gene signatures in muscle contraction and glucose metabolism pathways, while revealing what we believe to be previously undescribed isoform usage in mitochondrial and gene-expression-regulating proteins, including PPA1/PPA2, ANT1/ANT2, and PCBP1/PCBP2 switches. Paralogs with differential fetal usage tend to be evolutionarily recent, consistent with functional diversification. Alternative splicing adds another rich source of fetal isoform usage differences, involving PKM M1/M2, GLS1 KGA/GAC, PDLIM5 long/short, and other spliceoforms. When comparing absolute protein proportions, we observed a partial reversion toward fetal gene usage in pathological hearts. In summary, we present a ratiometric catalog of paralogs and spliceoform pairs in the cardiac fetal gene program. More generally, the results demonstrate the potential of applying the proteome-wide ratio test concept to discover new regulatory modalities beyond differential gene expression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci.insight.184309

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Han, Y., Binti, S., Wennersten, S. A., Pandi, B., Ng, D. C. M., Lau, E., & Lam, M. P. Y.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
Corresponding author
Lam, Maggie P.Y.
Venue
JCI Insight
Published
2025-08-07
Volume
10
Issue
20
ISSN
2379-3708 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4413044285
Cited by
5
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JCI Insight (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • NIH (R01-HL169473,R01-GM144456,R01-HL141278,R35-GM146815,, R00 HL144829)
  • American Heart Association (25POST1372064)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Congenital heart defects research
Keywords
paralogs, alternative splicing, cardiac remodeling, PDLIM5, mitochondrial proteins, glucose metabolism, muscle contraction, mouse heart

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review