Cited by 516Cardiovascular and exercise physiologyBiomedical and Chemical ResearchSports Performance and Training

THE PHYSIOLOGICAL MEANING OF THE MAXIMAL OXYGEN INTAKE TEST1

Open access
Mitchell, Jere H., Sproule, Brian J., Chapman, Carleton B.·1958·Journal of Clinical Investigation

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci103636

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cardiac output is one of the key predictors of VO2max and determines the efficiency of oxygen transport to exercising musculature.

    “Early physiological studies in humans demonstrated that one of the key predictors of an individual's VO 2 max is the blood flow generated by the heart, termed cardiac output (99), which determines the efficiency of oxygen transport to the exercising musculature.”

    From The Hippo signal transduction network for exercise physiologists (2016) · cites this paper as [99]

    The Discussion identifies cardiac output as a main circulatory determinant of maximal oxygen intake. But the Conclusions state that maximal oxygen intake depends on both cardiac output and the arteriovenous oxygen difference; the paper does not establish that cardiac output alone determines the efficiency of oxygen transport to exercising muscle. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 516

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Dill, D. B., and F6lling, A. Studies in muscular ac- tivity. II. A nomographic description of expired air. J. Physiol. 1928, 66, 133.
  2. Robinson, S. Metabolic adaptations to exhausting work as affected by training (abstract). Amer. J. Physiol. 1941, 133, 428.
  3. Hickam, J. B., Pryor, W. W., Page, E. B., and At- well, R. J. Respiratory regulation during exer- cise in unconditioned subjects. J. clin. Invest. 1951, 30, 503.
  4. Dill, D. B. Life, Heat, and Altitude. Physiological Effects of Hot Climates and Great Heights. Cam- bridge, Harvard University Press, 1938, p. 13.

Authors
Mitchell, J. H., Sproule, B. J., & Chapman, C. B.
Affiliations
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
1958-04-01
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
538-547
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1992941247
Cited by
516
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
25.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Clinical Investigation (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Public Health Service
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Biomedical and Chemical Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
VO2max, oxygen consumption, cardiorespiratory fitness, exercise physiology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review