Cited by 320Iron Metabolism and DisordersPhytase and its ApplicationsPlant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects

Food Iron Absorption Measured by an Extrinsic Tag

Open access
Cook, J. D., Layrisse, M., Martinez-Torres, C., Walker, R., Monsen, E., Finch, C. A.·1972·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

The paper describes the use of an extrinsic tag of inorganic radioiron to determine the total absorption of nonheme iron from a complete meal. The method was developed by measuring the iron absorbed from vegetable foods containing biosynthetically incorporated (55)Fe (intrinsic tag) and from (59)Fe added as a small dose of inorganic iron to the same meal (extrinsic tag). In studies with maize, black bean, and wheat, a consistent extrinsic: intrinsic radioiron absorption ratio averaging 1.10 was observed. Similar results were obtained with either ferrous or ferric iron as the extrinsic tag, and with doses of the latter ranging from 0.001 to 0.5 mg iron added to a test meal containing 2-4 mg of food iron. Adding the radioiron at different stages in preparation of the test meal also had little effect. Separate administration of the extrinsic tag was less satisfactory when small portions of a single food were employed, but with a complete meal, the separate dose was preferable. The extrinsic tag provided a valid measure of absorption despite marked differences in the iron status of the subject, and with wide changes in absorption imposed by adding desferrioxamine or ascorbic acid to the test meal. These findings indicate that there is a common pool of nonheme iron, the absorption of which is influenced by various blocking or enhancing substances present in the meal.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci106875

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The added radio-Fe uniformly labels all the non-haem food Fe in the meal.

    “The added radio-Fe uniformly labels all the non-haem food Fe in the meal.”

    From Inhibition of non-haem iron absorption in man by polyphenolic-containing beverages (1999) · cites this paper as Cook et al. 1972

    The Introduction and Discussion (pages unavailable in our copy) say the extrinsic radioiron tag can assess absorption from a common pool of nonheme iron in a meal. They do not show that added radioiron uniformly labels all nonheme food iron; the Discussion reports that absorption of the extrinsic tag was about 10% greater than absorption of the intrinsic tag. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Fe absorption was measured using the extrinsic tag radio-Fe technique with 55Fe and 59Fe.

    “Fe absorption was measured using the extrinsic tag radio-Fe technique with 55 Fe and 59 Fe (Cook et al. 1972).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Moore, C. V., and R. Dubach. 1951. Observations on the absorption of iron from foods tagged with radio- iron. Trans. Ass. Amer. Physicians Philadelphia. 64: 245.
  2. Palmer, H. E., and J. D. Cook. 1971. A counter for the direct measurement of 'Fe in blood and other liquid samples. I.E.E.E. Trans. Nucl. Sci. 18: 68.
  3. Snedecor, G. W., and W. G. Cochran. 1967. In Sta- tistical Methods. Iowa State University Press, Ames. 6th edition. 166, 296.
  4. Steel, R. G. D., and J. H. Torrie. 1960. In Principles and Procedures of Statistics, with Special Reference to the Biological Sciences. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York. 319.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cook, J. D., Layrisse, M., Martinez-Torres, C., Walker, R., Monsen, E., & Finch, C. A.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
1972-04-01
Volume
51
Issue
4
Pages
805-815
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2124476204
Cited by
320
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
13.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Investigation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • World Health Organization
  • University of Washington
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Iron Metabolism and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Phytase and its Applications
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects
Keywords
nonheme iron absorption, radioiron, iron status, maize, black bean, wheat, deferoxamine, vitamin C, iron bioavailability
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Zea mays, Female, Hematocrit, Humans, Intestinal Absorption, Iron, Iron Isotopes, Male, Middle Aged, Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Glycine max, Transferrin, Triticum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review