The neutrophilic leukocyte in wound repair
Open accessAbstract
The role of the neutrophilic leukocyte in wound healing was investigated by observing the progress of repair in the absence of these cells. Circulating neutrophils were eliminated in guinea pigs by the administration of antineutrophil serum (ANS) 24 hr before wounding and by daily injections throughout a 10 day period of healing. Control animals received normal rabbit serum at the same dose levels and times. The wounds consisted of six linear incisions in the dorsal skin of the animals.The contents of 24-hr neutropenic and control wounds were compared by quantitating the major cellular and extracellular wound components using a histometric technique. At 24 hr, there were no differences between control and neutropenic wounds in the per cent of total wound volume occupied by mononuclear leukocytes and fibrin. The neutropenic wounds had no neutrophils, had a significantly decreased volume of fluid space, and an increased volume of red cells, as compared with controls. The differences in numbers of erythrocytes and amount of fluid space in these two sets of wounds may be related to substances within neutrophils that promote lysis of erythrocytes or affect vascular permeability. In spite of the lack of neutrophils in the ANS-treated animals during the 10 days of healing, no differences were observed between the control and neutropenic wounds relative to the rate of wound debridement or the extent of repair. The wounds from the two groups of animals were identical in cellularity and degree of connective tissue formation. These observations support the notion that neither wound debridement nor the formation of granulation tissue are dependent upon the presence of neutrophils. A neutrophil response in early wounds is not an essential antecedent to the infiltration of monocytes, as suggested by previous investigations.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In non-aged, non-impaired mouse models, neutrophil depletion does not negatively affect wound healing as profoundly as macrophage deletion.
“mouse models of wound healing have shown that in non-aged, non-impaired models, neutrophil depletion does not negatively affect wound healing as profoundly as macrophage deletion [25–27].”
From Immunology of Wound Healing (2018) · cites this paper as [27]
Macrophages play a critical role in wound healing, including in angiogenesis, fibroplasia, cell proliferation, and transition out of the inflammatory phase.
“Macrophages play a critical role in wound healing, and their roles in angiogenesis, fibroplasia, cell proliferation, and transition out of the inflammatory phase is clear (Fig. 2) [25–27, 60].”
From Immunology of Wound Healing (2018) · cites this paper as [27]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 394
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Gillman, T. 1968. On some aspects of collagen formation in localized repair and in diffuse fibrotic reactions to injury. In Treatise on Collagen. B. S. Gould, editor. Academic Press, Inc., New York. 2 (Pt. B): 331.
- Hirsch, J. G. 1965. Neutrophil and eosinophil leukocytes. In The Inflammatory Process. B. W. Zweifach, L. Grant, and R. T. McCluskey, editors. Academic Press, Inc., New York. 245.
- Authors
- Simpson, D. M., & Ross, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Investigation
- Published
- 1972-08-01
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2009-2023
- ISSN
- 0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC292357
- OpenAlex
- W2158943553
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 6.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Investigation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Neutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Inflammation biomarkers and pathways
- Keywords
- neutrophils, wound healing, neutropenia, wound debridement, granulation tissue, monocyte infiltration, hemolysis, vascular permeability, fibrin, connective tissue formation
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Erythrocytes, Extracellular Space, Exudates and Transudates, Granulation Tissue, Guinea Pigs, Immune Sera, Inflammation, Leukocyte Count, Microscopy, Electron, Neutrophils, Rabbits, Skin, Wound Healing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review