The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nature of the vagal inhibitory innervation to the lower esophageal sphincter.
Open accessAbstract
The purpose of the present study was to investigate the nature of the vagal inhibitory innervation to the lower esophageal sphincter in the anesthetized opossum. Sphincter relaxation with electrical stimulation of the vagus was not antagonized by atropine, propranolol, phentolamine, or by catechloamine depletion with reserpine. A combination of atropine and propranolol was also ineffective, suggesting that the vagal inhibitory influences may be mediated by the noncholinergic, nonadrenergic neurons. To determine whether a synaptic link with nicotinic transmission was present, we investigated the effect of hexamethonium on vagal-stimulated lower esophageal sphincter relaxation. Hexamethonium in doses that completely antagonized the sphincter relaxation in response to a ganglionic stimulant, 1,1-dimethyl-4-phenylpiperazinium iodide (DMPP), did not block the sphincter relaxation in response to vagal stimulation at 10 pulses per second, and optimal frequency of stimulation. A combination of hexamethonium and catecholamine depletion was also ineffective, but hexamethonium plus atropine markedly antagonized sphincter relaxation (P less than 0.001). Moreover, 4-(m-chlorophenyl carbamoyloxy)-2-butyltrimethylammonium chloride (McN-A-343), a muscarinic ganglionic stimulant, also caused relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter. We suggest from these results that: (a) pthe vagal inhibitory pathway to the sphincter consists of preganglionic fibers which synapse with postganglionic neurons: (b) the synaptic transmission is predominantly cholinergic and utilizes nicotinic as well as muscarinic receptors on the postganglionic neuron, and; (c) postganglionic neurons exert their influence on the sphincter by an unidentified inhibitory transmitter that is neither adrenergic nor cholinergic.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pathophysiology of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Tack, J., & Pandolfino, J. E. (2018) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2017.09.047 · Cited by 417
Advances in the physiology of gastric emptying
Goyal, R. K., Guo, Y., & Mashimo, H. (2019) · Neurogastroenterology & Motility · doi:10.1111/nmo.13546 · Cited by 369
Self-citationPathogenesis of Reflux Esophagitis
Dodds, W. J., Hogan, W. J., Helm, J. F., & Dent, J. (1981) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/s0016-5085(81)80072-8 · Cited by 329
Neurohumoral, hormonal, and drug receptors for the lower esophageal sphincter
Goyal, R. K., & Rattan, S. (1978) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/0016-5085(78)90304-9 · Cited by 297
Self-citationPhysiology of Normal Esophageal Motility
Goyal, R. K., & Chaudhury, A. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology · doi:10.1097/mcg.0b013e31816b444d · Cited by 294
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Goyal, R. K., & Rattan, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Investigation
- Published
- 1975-05-01
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1119-1126
- ISSN
- 0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1979255962
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nature of the vagal inhibitory innervation to the lower esophageal sphincter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci108013
- The paper
- Goyal, R. K., & Rattan, S. (1975). Nature of the vagal inhibitory innervation to the lower esophageal sphincter. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci108013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.